They acted like maniacs, like they wanted the death of Karl Rove, and Condoleeza Rice at Columbia and American Universities, screaming SO LOUD that neither guest speaker could be heard above the mike, they threw objects at them! Why are Libs so enthusiastic over a terrorist supporter's speach? Remember Libs, the Iranian leader who is speaking to you, supports Hezzbollah, and Hezzbollah is a terrorist group, who wants you dead.
2007-09-24
07:23:29
·
24 answers
·
asked by
xenypoo
7
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
Do Libs know that Condoleeza Rice, and Karl Rove are Americans, like themselves, and Iran wants America to be controlled, or dead by them?
2007-09-24
07:24:56 ·
update #1
Because it`s hearing the liberal agenda of the dimokrat presidential candidates in another language . When in the end you don`t really need an interpreter, it`s all the same BS in any language ! Libs , when the terrorist Ahmadinejad says` "Death to America" , don`t be so naive and mind numbed to not know he means you too !!
2007-09-24 08:40:46
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
The Liberal students are Liberal and more humane than others.
You also remember the USA is the father of illegitimate child Israel and is the mother of all evil all over the world but since money is power it can do and undo any thing and every thing.
We can not support destruction of Israel or USA as we feel ourselves to be civilised. What about other SOBs?
2007-09-24 14:43:22
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
Being quiet and listening politely is,in your opinion an expression of enthusiastic support?
I'll remember that next time I go to a basketball game. All the quiet,silent,glum,mute people on the bleachers are just showing their enthusiasm.
(Hezbollah may want YOU dead but I rather doubt it has any plans for me here in the U.S. I am a U.S. citizen. I am not an Israeli. Israelies want Hezbollah dead. Tit for tat. Not our quarrel.)
2007-09-24 14:35:10
·
answer #3
·
answered by Tebow 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
How do you know that they are not? Because Fox News isn't showing it?
Rove and Rice have the power to carry through with their threats to the American system. Ahmadinejad does not. I would not go see him speak, and disagree with inviting him to Columbia but I think this is a non-issue that has been beaten to death.
2007-09-24 14:28:51
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
4⤋
They don't want to be tazered bro.
Seriously they are probably instructed that any protest will lead to removal.The biggest trouble makers are probably not even allowed to attend.
Though I don't agree with everything you say I would welcome it if there was a student protest anyway.The human rights situation in Iran is very bad and the Iranians can't speak out.It would be good if the students stood up for human rights.
2007-09-24 14:31:43
·
answer #5
·
answered by justgoodfolk 7
·
3⤊
4⤋
Brainwashed Zombies that are mezmerized by a dictator. Are they recieving grants from him? Has he made monetary contributions to their colleges? Remember they are they next generation to rule America.
2007-09-24 14:35:27
·
answer #6
·
answered by ShadowCat 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
Whatever.
But I will agree with your assertion that the Iranians want America to be controlled by Karl Rove and Condaleeza Rice or have the two of them kill us if that'll make you happy.
2007-09-24 14:29:43
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
5⤋
They are misguided little blind ideologues. They attack a minuteman but quietly listen to a tyrrant who murders women by stoning and gays as well not to mention how others are mistreated. He is a tyrrant, nothing less but they love the guy.
2007-09-24 14:34:05
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
3⤋
Rove is a member of the US government and is a corrupt scumbag...if the Iranian leader was a US leader, he would get the same treatment. We hold our own to a higher standard, as well we should.
2007-09-24 14:27:40
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
12⤊
4⤋
er... I think the LIBERAL university president already said everything that most people were thinking...
he didn't dress down Condi and Rove before they spoke... may he should have? it would have been more civil probably...
2007-09-24 14:30:16
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋