A tomato is redder.
Bush is readier.
Some difference there. But not much.
2007-09-24 06:56:33
·
answer #1
·
answered by Handy man 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
A ripe tomato doesn't have a mouth, and therefore can't say any of the stupid things Bush does. I'd say the tomato wins based on that alone.
2007-09-24 14:08:52
·
answer #2
·
answered by lafemelle 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Tomatoes have been genetically modified to allow a longer shelf life after being pulled from the dirt
perhaps GB needs some gene therapy
2007-09-24 13:58:37
·
answer #3
·
answered by tongasurfer 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
It is pretty apparent that Bush is smarter than the tomato. Just look at the profit margins for the big corporations especially the ones benefiting from this war.
2007-09-24 13:58:15
·
answer #4
·
answered by Twilight 6
·
3⤊
1⤋
President Bush.
Tomatos are inanimate objects.
2007-09-24 13:53:21
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
The tomato would remember that Nelson Mandela is still alive.
2007-09-24 13:48:37
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
4⤋
Bush is smarter then Kerry and Kerry is in the ketchup business.
2007-09-24 13:47:13
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
4⤋
are we talking of a regular tomato? or a talking kind? think of your answer very carefully!!.
2007-09-24 14:12:46
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
President Bush. Would you care to try to match his college degrees against yours?
2007-09-24 13:47:34
·
answer #9
·
answered by regerugged 7
·
4⤊
4⤋
They are both smarter than you.
2007-09-24 13:53:22
·
answer #10
·
answered by harshmistressmoon 4
·
3⤊
2⤋