Defeatists Dems-What are they thinking?

Question

Do the dems Clinton, Pelosi and the like accept the fact that eventually, we will be serving our fanactial muslim masters?
They won't defend General Petraeus against the indesciable attack by their friends at MoveOn.org.. An outfit that wants to see the defeat of our country. Also, they want to turn and run when many aspects of the conflict in Iraq are positive.

Answer 1

You are assuming that liberal, socialist Democrats can think. That would require that they grow a brain. It's much easier for them to parrot the liberal talking points, most of which are thinly disguised lies. If a lib actually thinks about what is in the talking points, he/she quickly rejects it, and becomes a convert. So, how many converts do you see?
________________________________________
KrazyKyngeKorny(Krazy, not stupid)
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯

Answer 2

Well considering that the General LIED and was busted lying I think they're right in line and fanatical muslim masters you're a nutcase loon, the only thing these idiots can do is cause fear and as Roosevelt said the only thing we have to fear is fear itself, there is NO WAY they can take over America only an imbecile thinks they could so if the shoe fits wear it pal
The General tells the foriegn press this
“It has not worked out as we had hoped,” the general said
“Many of us had hoped this summer would be a time of tangible political progress at the national level,” Petraeus wrote. “All participants, Iraqi and coalition alike, are dissatisfied by the halting progress on major legislative initiatives,” he wrote.
but tells the American press this
“Based on the progress our forces are achieving, I expect to be able to recommend that some of our forces will be redeployed without replacement,” he told the Boston Globe by email on Friday…. “Few of these political solutions would have been possible without the improved security provided by coalition and Iraqi forces.”


and here's a link to the artcle where he states the surge DIDN'T WORK
http://www.mg.co.za/articlepage.aspx?are...

Also there's the GAO report that refutes his report so Moveon called it right
Also Commander of CentComm Fallon called him an @ss kissing chickenS*#t so I trust the GAO, His immediate superior and the Generals OWN WORDS prior to testifying over what he told Congress

Answer 3

What kind of twisted thinking equates criticizing Petraeus’ testimony to serving Muslim masters? Your leaps of logic are based on false and absurd premises. This kind of thinking is thankfully not shared by most Americans. I think Petraeus deserved every bit of the criticism he received. This is ridiculous, expecting Democrats to condemn the free speech exercise of those who are telling the truth.

Answer 4

1) Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11
2) Saddam had no weapons of mass destruction.
3) Terrorism wasn't a problem in Iraq until we destabilized the place.
4) Saddam and Osama bin Laden were natural enemies.
5) Terrorist recruiting has been on the rise ever since the invasion of Iraq.
6) The use of force in Iraq allowed the Taliban to regain strength in Afghanistan.
7) Where is Osama anyway?


What the hell were you guys thinking?

Answer 5

I am thinking that you are the one who sounds like a defeatist -- you seem to think that fanatical muslims can take over the United States.

Answer 6

Look...a conservative telling us to be afraid...what to be afraid of...and who to blame.

It's like doing mad libs except they words are always filled in already and the text just changes slightly....

Be afraid of MUSLIMS because of DEMOCRATS....


Yawn

Answer 7

If you were really a conservative you would be aware of the inside joke. Obviously not.

Answer 8

You think that our troops can't beat the 'muslim masters'. I'm sorry that you don't support the troops in their abilities.

Answer 9

I just hope the government schooled voters wake up and smell the camel dung.

There was nothing but the truth told about Kerry and Cleland.

Answer 10

Its obvious - if they can pin defeat on the GOP they can use that to gain power. ALL of their schemes are aimed at gaining power.