it freedom of expression or was he trying to incite a riot?your thoughts please.
2007-09-24 00:52:10 · 9 answers · asked by moanalisa 4 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
To advertise his hatred, and get the admiration of his buddies, no doubt
2007-09-24 02:03:56 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I guess legally it was freedom of expression. Honestly the law makers need to do something about this. What happens when you hang someone? They die? Wouldnt waving a gun around be freedom of expression if someone thought someone should die? I also however don't condone beating the crap out of someone because they made you angry.
2007-09-24 08:11:51 · answer #2 · answered by Ladybugs77 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Some may call it a right and some a speech. It's basically an invitation to continue a fight using old Texan style language.
2007-09-24 08:05:34 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I don't agree with the pick up drivers's actions and I personally think it was in poor taste, but he has a right to express his opinion of the situation just as the thousands of protestors expressed theirs with signs and speeches...........
2007-09-24 08:02:50 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
I'd go with the fact that he was just a frigging idiot. No shortage of them around, unfortunately.
2007-09-24 08:33:33 · answer #5 · answered by thegubmint 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Both
2007-09-24 07:56:48 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
It is the same kind of freedom of expression as shouting 'fire' in a crowded theater.
2007-09-24 07:57:30 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
He was freely expressing his stupidity. 2D
2007-09-24 09:54:22 · answer #8 · answered by 2D 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Neither. He was an idiot.
2007-09-24 08:01:51 · answer #9 · answered by that_guy 5 · 2⤊ 3⤋