Can The Pro McCann's Prove The McCanns Are Innocent?

Question

ok, just provide your EVIDENCE that they are innocent

there is more to suggest they are guilty rather than innocent

Answer 1

actually theres not much hard evidence to prove they are guilty either. most of it is speculation on both sides. no-one knows

Answer 2

If you are talking about manslaughter/murder, then let's get real now, shall we? Unless you are involved in the crime or investigation you have no clue what happened. Nor have you seen the evidence. All any of us have seen is speculation. This is a basic FACT.

The crux of the matter is that - no matter how many people whine about it - in this democracy, people are presumed innocent until proven guilty. This is not an indication that I support the McCanns or believe in their innocence. It is a simple statement of fact and rational common sense.

I have my own feelings about this, we all do, and I'm obviously just as human as anyone else. However, my opinion means nothing when it comes to establishing guilt in this case, and nor does yours or anyone else's here.

I have no idea whether they are innocent or not so I refuse to say that I know for certain.I'm not the most rational person alive, but I still know how to analyse facts, and I'm sensible enough to know that one needs access to all the facts to make a truly informed judgement on a case.

Now, I am not stating that I understand the McCanns behaviour, nor am I saying that I think they should have left their children: to me, it is common sense that you do not leave young kids alone, it is wrong. I am simply saying this: we don't know, so why presume that we do, and what is the use of grouping people with varied opinions under two exceptionally silly umbrella terms, 'pro' and 'anti'? It's absurd.

Answer 3

If the McCanns are responsible of overlook then so are tens of hundreds people who've accomplished precisely what they, and the others of their group, did that nighttime. i've got been taking infants and grandchildren on trip at abode and out of the country for almost 40 years and have constantly placed the infants to mattress in stable time in accordance to age, and prepared to bypass to many times whilst having the nighttime far off from them at a hotel eating room or close to by ability of eating place. i don't recognize any of my huge circle of associates, like the McCanns customarily expert people of stable status, who does no longer have accomplished an identical - under pressure from the better halves and mothers who contend, unlike households in Southern Europe, that the priority is for infants to have a robust nights sleep and not be dragged off to 3 eating place til all hours which interior reach young ones many times are. that's a cultural count no longer against the regulation - and that i come across that the Dutch and the Belgians easily do an identical. So this talk of guilt is fake and a nonsense.

Answer 4

Lack of proof of guilt is all the evidence of innocence that a civilised judicial system requires.

The burden of proof is on the police to find and present (to a court, not to the public) evidence of their guilt. They have not yet done so. This means that the McCanns are entitled to the presumption of innocence.

Let us not forget that Robert Murat has been decared an "arguido" and has subsequently, we are told, been informed that he has no case to answer. This demonstrates that being made a formal suspect does not mean that someone is definitely guilty or that charges will necessarily follow.

The only rational thing to do is to reserve judgement and await developments.

Answer 5

No one can prove anything. We can't prove that the McCanns were involved in the death of their daughter, and the Pro's can't prove that the McCanns were not involved.

IMHO, however, we need not prove that the McCanns were neglectful of their children. There seems to be two options here, A) The Tapas 9 were somehow involved in the death of Madeleine and hid her body or B) A "million to one" event occured and Madeleine was abducted by a strange "Predator".

The Pro-McCanns prefer version B), yet seem unable to admit that if this IS what happened, Gerry & Kate are still responsible for their daughters disappearance, by not being with her and her siblings so as to be able to prevent this "predator" taking Madeleine.

Either way, they are guilty of neglecting their children, and responsible, therefore, for what happened to Madeleine.

Answer 6

The only people who actually know for sure are the McCanns themselves.Their spin doctors and lawyers are currently engaged in creating a smoke screen of confused and conflicting information being fed to the media.You only have to ask yourself why they are doing this to form an opinion.The pro McCanns seem to be able to dismiss this unusual behaviour by the grieving parents.

Answer 7

Only someone very close to the case could possibly have proof one way or another. And evidence that they did *not* do something? It is very difficult to prove a negative under any circumstances. That is why people are presumed innocent until proven guilty. It is the job of the state to find evidence and prove that somebody *is" guilty.

If you were in their spot and if you were innocent, is that how you would like to dealt with? "Prove you are not guilty"?
-

Answer 8

Innocent until PROVEN guilty.


Can you prove they are guilty then?
You are basing your opinion on just hear-say. There is no 100% solid info other than the fact Madelaine is missing.

I have my opinions too but it is based simply on the info we are given from the media.

Answer 9

Why do i believe that the McCanns are innocent of murdering their Madeleine?
1. 'cos theres no proof they did.
2. 'cos of the way they strive to spread awareness of their Madeleine with no regard to the flak & scrutiny hurled against them.
3. 'cos till now there is no little body found in spite of experts, sniffer dogs & the worldwide pressure on the PJ.
4. 'cos there is no motive.
5. 'cos there is no history or indication of past abuse, unstability or unhappiness in that family.
6. 'cos IF they were, even if it were accidental, they would have cracked by now.
7. 'cos all the accusations hurled against them are based on nothing but conjecture & HEARSAY.

Answer 10

Kamran, dear - no one can prove anything at the moment, that's why there's so much controversy. Had that escaped your notice?

And why is it necessary to be either pro or anti McCann? I am neither. I was not there, I do not know what happened. And neither, my friend, do you.

Answer 11

you cant prove you havent done something

im not pro-mccanns but i do feel that whatever happened, little maddies story has been picked over by the vultures looking for news, gossip or controversy enough