It is too early to tell now as the youngsters have just started playing for india and only time will prove whether they are good or bad.
2007-09-22 03:53:23
·
answer #1
·
answered by vakayil k 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Younger's are better than seniors because Seniors are acting like a players only youngers are playing. Indian cricket team as to remove the senior players from team. This match is a great example how to play without seniors with super performance... After this semi final match I hope Indian team as planed to go in a right way only with yougers...
Indian cricket associate should help Indian team to become a best team in the world by sending seniors to home.
2007-09-22 23:48:01
·
answer #2
·
answered by Rajesh Kumar K 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Every sport has got its up's and down's I do agree to those who say that younger players have an upper hand against their senior players. For the young players they always learn for improvement, maturity, aggressiveness, take up challenge in a cool fashion, pumped up, lively, better chance of being fit for the job and it goes on for every aspect. It doesn't mean that the senior players are insufficient or not upto the standard. But with younger players in the side they tend to take things cool since they dont have much experience to back them. And try to work out of the most difficult situation. They take it with such lively attitude which in turn influences the rest of the team. With the current form of the Indian team and Captian MS Dhoni I believe this is an ideal platform for all the future players to be positive and take up challenge in such a manner to enjoy the game. I also agree that the Indian team is on a roll and should try to keep the momentum going. Though MS Dhoni is short of experience by captaining the side, there is not a big problem to it coz it will be alright for him to learn and strive for the improvement. I like his combinations, decisions, positive attitude which is a sign of the younger blood pumped up. Chak de India!
2007-09-22 22:34:14
·
answer #3
·
answered by no17.king 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes younger are defiantly better than the seniors because seniors had won much money by playing and now they were only thinking how to make new records. On the other hand younger have to earn money t earn they have to play good so younger should be given more chances. OK
2007-09-22 18:39:12
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Its all about fitness my dear friend. If senior players are lazy n sloppy in the field like often you'd see saurav ganguly then definitely in the over bounded game they should be ruled out n let the young blood warm the ground as every little run counts to the fullest.
On the other hand, if the seniors are as fit as the youngsters or even better in that case; taking for example Sanath Jayasurya or even Murali for that case, Youngsters Bye Bye! They'r expierenced yet hungry
2007-09-22 06:41:12
·
answer #5
·
answered by -S o l i t u d e- 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes definitely. Youngsters are more energetic, aggressive,
agile, adaptive, motivated, devoted. They have shorter
learning curves. They have lot more to achive in their career
as compared to seniors. They are free of ego-clashes or
lobbying. While seniors have only ONE advantage over
youngsters i.e. "Experience". Most of the senior players have
already risen to their peaks and have seen glory e.g. Lara,
Inzimam.
Success youngsters' Examples are Ricky Ponting(Aus),
Graeme Smith (SA), Mahela Jaywardene(SL), Shoaib Malik
(Pak), MS Dhoni (IND). Every team currently is prefering
younger captains. Youngsters have the abillity to change the
scene of the game just like Shahid Afridi(of Pak) did with his
Explosive Blaster 100 of 37 balls against SriLanka.
Shoaib Akhtar(Pak) and Brett Lee(Aus) broke the 100mph
barriers.
Hence, for twenty20 cricket I'd go with 7 youngsters out of 11.
After all, senior's experience can't be ignored
2007-09-23 20:13:48
·
answer #6
·
answered by Raheel Akhtar 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
well youngsters have less experience and that matters a lot, because of that they will be more vunerable in pressure situations but they are also very fresh and can be great fielders and they can make some amazing innings because no one expects anything much from them
I think there should be a youngster and senior balance in a team, that will make them really strong
the juniors with athleticism get fast runs, while the seniors lead them and play the anchor of the team
remember youngsters are the future team and even the seniors were once youngsters
2007-09-22 02:43:20
·
answer #7
·
answered by DeJm@ 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, Because Seniors have more experience than younger on other side younger have energy so the combination of experience and energy is the best for teams.
2007-09-22 00:16:23
·
answer #8
·
answered by divekar 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes younger players are much better now in the cricket because they have to really work hard in the domestic seasons and they had also much ability to absorb the pressure.I am saying this with so much confidence because i am playing in pakistan under 17 cricket team and in such type of cricket i think u have to really work hard and this is the main reason that younger players are playing better than senior players
2007-09-21 22:05:32
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, definitely because they are very active in the fielding,
, they show more enthusiasm than senior players, may be they lack some experience but they will make it out as time progress
2007-09-22 00:35:08
·
answer #10
·
answered by aneesh k 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
A team should be mixed with senior players and young Players but it should be in the ratio 70(young):30(Senior). So even we can have aggressive cricket as well as smart cricket, Any how the team should have mind set to win the match in confident and Positive way. Also, Please guys don't show your attitude problem in the matches and goof it. Be Unity and win the match . Also, have in mind that you are playing for yourself especially for our great country India, need to be proud..Chakde India.
2007-09-22 04:37:47
·
answer #11
·
answered by Sheriff s 1
·
0⤊
0⤋