Cricket
2007-09-21 19:17:09 · 78 answers · asked by prakki 1 in Sports ➔ Cricket
YES. IT IS A DEFINITE LBW OUT.
2007-09-21 19:33:26 · answer #1 · answered by rajesh gopinath 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In Cricket, if the ball hits the back leg for plumb LBW and then hits the bat, then it will be given as a LBW. It must be given out because the ball first hits the leg then comes to the bat and hits it.
2007-09-23 22:25:56 · answer #2 · answered by Sounak Das 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes. Because the ball would have taken the stumps, had the ball not touched the leg and therefore the question of hitting bat after hitting the leg does not have any importance for the purpose of LBW.
2007-09-22 18:24:05 · answer #3 · answered by sameerpjain 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, as long as it hits the pad first and meets all requirements of an LBW, it will be out.
Law 36 of cricket covers LBW and part (c) says "and (c) the ball not having previously touched his bat,".
Hence, as long as the ball does not "previously" touch the bat the batsman will be out.
2007-09-22 07:03:58 · answer #4 · answered by dad_to_be (is now a dad) 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes. As long as the ball hits the batsman first on the pads in the line of the stumps, it is eligible to ruled as a LBW, provided the height of the ball is not above the stumps at the point of contact.
2007-09-22 19:55:50 · answer #5 · answered by Rupam D 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes LBW means ' leg before wicket'. If ball hits the batters pads in line with the stumps - it is lbw - whether it then bounces off the stumps, bat or whatever; afterwards .. It's the initial hit that counts.
2007-09-22 04:39:47 · answer #6 · answered by Gini F 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes. Because first of all, the ball's flight towards the wicket was obstructed by the batsman's leg in front of the wicket (hence LBW) and the ball hit the bat after that and too, because it was deflected by the leg. Hence, it is LBW as if the leg had not obstructed, the batsman would have been bowled.
2007-09-22 04:21:15 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
yes, ball hitting the pads plumb before taking the bat will be given lbw.
2007-09-23 06:20:24 · answer #8 · answered by balkrishna 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
OUT! because the person is plumb LBW and more important is ball hits the pad first than bat.
2007-09-22 13:36:05 · answer #9 · answered by adnan l 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If the ball first hits the leg and then the bat, the batsman will be out LBW
2007-09-22 03:57:07 · answer #10 · answered by vakayil k 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not out.
Otherwise, a ball merely brushing pad/s, even if hit for a boundary/six will lead to an out-lbw decision. This will be very unjust to batsman.
If a ball was certain to dislodge bail/s but could not, due to a contact with batsman or anything he/she wore/carried, should lead to an out-lbw decision.
If, however, that ball also subsequently touched or hit bat, the batsman must be given not-out.
2007-09-22 03:55:15 · answer #11 · answered by Yezdi 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋