2007-09-21 16:45:03 · 28 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
End the war of course, who doesn't want that to happen? We're just not in favor of "pulling out" or the "cut and run" approach. We make sure jobs get done right.
As far as Hillary, don't make me laugh, she is a joke. Many republicans hate Hillary for her stupidity, but I like her, because she makes me laugh. I just find it hilarious that she thinks she has a chance to win presidency ( I now refer to her Hillaryious, because she is so comical) . WHEW, I laugh so hard when I think of her running for president.
2007-09-21 18:27:48 · answer #1 · answered by Rocman 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
End the war then send Hillary to Iraq.
2007-09-29 05:39:19 · answer #2 · answered by lynnsanner@sbcglobal.net 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I would love to see the was in Iraq end but only when they are able to govern and protect themselves. I am not pro war I think it sucks but I do support our troops and the hard work they are doing to protect our country from terrorism which is why they are there now. it may have started for different reasons but that is exactly what it is now. As far as Hillary is concerned when she stands against our troops and support dumb organizations like moveon well she deserves what she gets and I hope its a boot in the rear!!! God Bless America!
2007-09-21 18:18:07 · answer #3 · answered by renee70466 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
So I'm guessing you think that ending the war will be bad news for Hillary?
I see. I guess that's why the Democrats keep funding the war.
Seems it's the Democrats who benefit most from the continuation of the war. Does that make THEM 'pro-war'?
2007-09-21 16:58:22 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
The U.S. is building a super large military base on the Iran Iraq border seems we,ll be there for ever. Load help us if Hillary gets in
2007-09-28 11:54:25 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
War? War implies armies facing each other on open battle fields using strategy to outwit opposing forces.
This is a collossal blunder into a country occupied by good people governed by a ruthless dictator.
The United States led by Republican George W Bush's Administration and supported by the National Republic Party have led this country into a costly unwinnable deadly conflict with a people whom we have turned into a sizable force of militants who are now firmly against the United States and want us out of their country so they can get on with their lives even if it involves civil war.
But, hey! It's about oil!
Thanks
2007-09-29 16:51:29 · answer #6 · answered by telwidit 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I honestly don't see the parallel that you have drawn.
Hillary voted to allow the invasion and she supported the war right up until she got the news from her campaign people that this wasn't a very wise political stance - hence, she immediately "re-evaluated" her position and went with what she felt would result in more votes.
This is a person who evades every attempt to give a simple yes or no answer when asked if she supports the ad posted by Moveon.org in the NY Times - she obviously feels that she can't even afford to upset the far left lunatics in her attempt to garner as much support as possible - even if it means trashing a patriotic, four star general basically as a traitor and someone who has betrayed America.
If she can't even stand up to a far left, hateful, anti-American web site, how would she possibly deal with world leaders intent on America's demise?
I suspect (and hope) that despite her powerful political machine and her seemingly unlimited funds that the American people will once again see yet another democrat for what she is and vote republican - as they did when they weighed the possibility and scary reality of John Kerry as commander-in chief..
2007-09-21 17:21:51 · answer #7 · answered by LeAnne 7 · 5⤊ 1⤋
1 out of 2, and Hillary is not the answer
2007-09-29 13:42:08 · answer #8 · answered by Bego?a R 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hillary is on record as saying she believes it is too dangerous to take all troops out of Iraq because of Iran's nuclear ambitions. It won't matter who gets elected. Troops will be left in bases in Iraq in numbers significant to deter Iran. Even Obama said this in an interview to PBS earlier this week.
Kent in SD
2007-09-21 17:31:44 · answer #9 · answered by duckgrabber 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
the war will end. Occupation may last decades, just like our current military presence in Japan, Germany, Italy, Korea, etc. Our best allies are our ex-enemies. Freedom and capitalism are contagious. Two faced politicians are exposed in the bright light of an open society. She can't even convince her own party of her stance from one day to the next.
2007-09-29 16:33:01 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋