English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

...that means Hillary, Romney Giuliani and any other puppets of the bankers and corporations. The Bush-Clinton crime family seems to work well for corporations how can we stop that?

2007-09-21 16:40:14 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Elections

19 answers

Stop giving the Federal government so much power. Insist on following the 10th Amendment. The Feds should be doing one thing and one thing only - protecting our country and regulating interstate commerce. Everything else is the State's responsibility.

2007-09-21 16:44:15 · answer #1 · answered by wigginsray 7 · 5 1

most say vote, and this is admirable. if everything was all good and wonderful like we'd like to imagine, getting out the vote would turn things around. however, i'd call your attention to the 2004 election voter fraud rampant in many parts of the usa. what happened?

Vote suppression/voter intimidation and deception. Shortages of voting locations and ballot forms. Foreign monitors barred from polls. Unmatched exit polls/actual results - actual results always skewed to Republicans. Masses of e-Voting "glitches". Computers lost votes. Presidential votes miscast on e-Voting machines throughout the US. More recorded votes than voters. Republicans gained 128.45% in Florida counties using optical scan voting machines while Democrats lost 21% - some districts showed gains of over 400% while one, Liberty County, gained over 700% for Republicans.Warren County officials locked down the county administration building on election night and blocked anyone from observing the vote count as the nation awaited Ohio's returns. Bush had 'incredible' vote tallies. 7% turnout reported in Cleveland precinct. In Cuyahoga County different towns had the exact same number of "extra" votes. And on, and on...

2007-09-21 23:56:02 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

It will be Hillary because it can only be a puppet governement. Anyone who threatens to expose that, president wise, will just be assassinated. I don't see any way of stopping this trainwreck but I have a strong belief that character will be the new latest trend in these harsh times and after the harsh times that await. Hillary, bring on the BS cause we're all waitin to call your corrupt thighness out.

2007-09-21 23:44:49 · answer #3 · answered by America scarica 3 · 0 2

Bill Hicks?

Vote Obama, there's less chance of him being a puppet for bankers and corporations. There's no point in wasting your vote on somebody who doesn't have a chance. It's sad, but true. You have to vote for someone who's 'rich.' I'd personally like to see Ron Paul get elected, but I know he doesn't have a chance.

Give me a thumbs down if you agree!

2007-09-21 23:43:43 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

Keep Clinton out of the office.

2007-09-22 09:47:45 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Cut the strings of the puppets.

Here's how.

1. Go to the polls and vote third party if you live in one of the states which is already decided by historical voting pattern. Vote third party in AL, AK, AZ, CT, DE, DC, GA, HI, ID, IL, IN, KS, KY, LA, ME, MD, MA, MS, MO, NJ, NY, NC, ND, OK, RI, SC, SD, TN, TX, UT, VT, VA, WA, WV OR WY.

Some of these will go democratic and some will go republican, but all are essentially decided, so vote third party and knock the NATIONAL winner under 50 percent.

1a. Alternative version of the third party vote: register with Unity08 as the web-based third party and then vote to nominate Michael Bloomberg, the mayor of New York City and former Democrat as well as former Republican. Bloomberg will spend $500 million to $1 billion of his own money to win, and that's a lot more independence than the corporate hacks the major parties are going to nominate (perhaps Hillary Clinton against Fred Thompson, I reckon).

So if you take option 1a, nominate Bloomberg and vote for him in November of 2008 no matter where you live.

2. If you don't live in the option 1 states because you live in NEVADA, and you reject option 1a, then vote for "none of these candidates," an option available with all ballot choices in, and only in, Nevada. The parties lock out this option elsewhere in the nation.

3. Suppose you live in a "battleground state," the states that are actually going to decide the 2008 election? What do you do? Hold your nose and vote for the lesser of two evils?

I have a secret plan for you. It'll cost you 10 points for the best answer.

The battleground states for 2008 are: AR, CO, FL, IA, MI, MN, MO, NH, NM, OH, OR, PA and WI. Nevada is also a battleground state, but the choice there is "none of these candidates" or Bloomberg, depending on whether you choose option 1 or option 1a.

here's the secret plan for the other battleground states. Pay attention. No one else is going to tell you this. I've been watching elections closely since I was a little kid in 1960 (!), and I know this stuff.

Go to your polling place in AR, CO, FL, IA, MI, MN, MO, NH, NM, OH, OR, PA and WI. Go in the voting booth. OK, you don't have Nevada's wonderful choice. So CREATE IT FOR YOURSELF. Here's how. Find at least one statewide office that matters to you, such as governor, senator, state attorney general, or a state referendum, initiative or state constitutional question -- note -- the highest statewide OFFICE between individuals works best for this -- and vote for that race/ those races.

You CREATE "none of the above" by SKIPPING THE TOP OF THE TICKET. It's called "undervoting." The political wags and spin doctors around presidential candidates are keenly aware of undervoters -- they kept well informed, patriotically went to the polls, voted in OTHER RACES and ignored the hack they are trying to sell us like toothpaste.

When a "president elect" wins because he carried, say, Ohio or FLorida, and yet in that state the senate race totals MORE VOTES than the presidential race, he knows he's on very, very, very thin ice. We scare the hack that wins and his embarassed professional staff, which is something we sorely need to do.

Undervoting also encourages third party movements. "We win" with this strategy.

2007-09-21 23:44:17 · answer #6 · answered by urbancoyote 7 · 4 3

Ron Paul

2007-09-21 23:45:50 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

vote Ron Paul, the only one you know is not a party puppet

2007-09-22 02:23:16 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Corporations know that a happy populous spends more money.
Therefore they have your best interest in mind.

2007-09-21 23:53:32 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

ALL the choices are CORRUPT! It is time for a more political parties in the U.S., but that won't be for awhile, so in the interim, just write in a candidate.

2007-09-22 00:16:34 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers