not a good person, he may very well be. But as a president he sucks balls :)
2007-09-21 15:48:13 · 19 answers · asked by hunterkyrie 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
ok, sorry I used the words balls, were all adults here, or at least I think, grow up it's not a profanity, it's just a word. how many people call testicles, testicles....
2007-09-21 15:56:37 · update #1
How many terrorist attacks on the US since 9/11........#####
2007-09-21 15:53:06 · answer #1 · answered by ? 5 · 4⤊ 4⤋
Yep! President George W. Bush/Cheney and something of the lizard like good wingers are actually sitting the degree on your presentation. I surely have been suspecting this for a while now and that i've got faith that's what's conserving the Democratic congress back from doing any beneficial motions to hold the troops back. it fairly is a undesirable reflected photograph on democracy and how it works. This national Republican administration has weakened united states of america of america shape, the very beginning up on which the entire government relies. it particularly is sickening how genuinely it replaced into finished via help of the unlearned Republican plenty who're not reaping benefits in any respect from the legislature that has been enforced and that legislature that has been weakened through loss of enforcement and constrained investment. This Republican administration under George W. Bush is a shame to united states of america of america. thank you
2016-10-19 09:07:55 · answer #2 · answered by neher 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The main reason I like George W. Bush is because he isn't like Al Gore. He doesn't want to put your money in a "Lock Box". Bush is the typical Republican President. He doesn't believe the federal government should be controlling every dollar you make. Does he do a great job of communicating with the public? No. He does a terrible job. People may dislike him because of the situation in Iraq. They may feel like he spent too much money on Iraq, but he never did raise taxes. There isn't really that much to complain about. I do give Hillary Clinton credit for being more articulate than George W. Bush. She knows exactly what to say and when to say it. She also knows exactly how to spend your money and when to spend it.
2007-09-24 07:59:43 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am not sure that I would say he is a good president- hemay be visionary but he has failed miserably at executing good ideas and concepts.
ex. Establishing a democarcy in Afgahn. and Iraq is a great, noble and history making , radical good idea. It can lead to stabilization for the whole middle east and the bringing of human rights to the arabs which have been denied them by their own tribes and leaders for a thousand year. But when it comes to did he execute this plan well and in turn be considered good at being a president- probabaly not. Though I give him credit for trying for the moon though he has until recently stubbornly, failed to consider the culture and the need for not just 130,000 troops but 300,000 to get the job done right.( yep my son is on his way there next month)
So good man with great ideas and big dreams for the world yes- and possibly author of a great plan to bring peace to the middle east- yes. Effective communicator and good execution of the goal - nope.
But then a I would rather have Bush as president who sucks balls ( not a bad thing if you are onthe reciving end) than gore or Kerry who are more concerned with false human made global warming and have no understanding that these folks hate us because we are not muslim enough and want to kill us. Bush may suck balls but as good of men as they in their own way may be ( and i think they have thier good points)when it comes to taking care of america, they are not only incapable but ill informed .
2007-09-21 16:02:07 · answer #4 · answered by allamericanred2 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
He isn't bought and owned or cowed by communist China or fascist Russia. That makes him "good". Not "great", his dealings with Mexico and failure to enforce the law is impeachable, but the dems don't want to alienate the Hispanic vote, and so they are just as culpable. His too politically correct approach to the Middle East, his reliance on Saudis, his failure to open the oil reserves in ANWAR and on our own coastlines (not to mention the coast is our best wind and hydro turbine locations) but rather supporting the foolish and inefficient corn or palm oil ethanol program makes me disgusted.
2007-09-21 16:00:47 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
What he is a water carrier for the multi national globalist. He just has more power to wheel. But everyone that has been in the senate and congress for more then three terms is also sloshing at the trough of big business and their lobbists.
2007-09-21 18:51:43 · answer #6 · answered by wild4gypsy 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I guess I won't get ten points. To those that said there have been no attacks since 9/11.you don't believe it was due to the chimp do you.? I see he screwed up again ,said that Mandela was dead.
2007-09-21 16:16:51 · answer #7 · answered by JT 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Wow, I was going to give you a comprehensive list of all the liberal things Bush has done but, because you felt the need to use profanity in your question, I doubt you would have the maturity to even understand it so, I'll just take the two points and wish you a pleasent evening.
Pax
2007-09-21 15:53:30 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 5⤋
I can't prove it to you,there is no evidence to suggest that George W Bush is a good president.
2007-09-21 15:50:52 · answer #9 · answered by Candi Apples 7 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Can't do it 'cause he's not. Won't get 10 did get 2.
2007-09-21 15:59:58 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
better question elmer...how many attacks before 9/11??
2007-09-21 16:09:37 · answer #11 · answered by xkiss_thisx2 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋