Russian Revolution: Tsar overthrown?

Question

Write out the follow three statements, and then add to each one a list of statements that support the idea in each one.

a) Nicholas and Alexandra deserve the most blame for the overthrowing of the Tsar
b)The Tsar was overthrown because of WWI
c) Russia was in such a disastrous state, the Tsar would probably was been overthrown even without WWI

Answer 1

Well, firstly, I think your teacher is biased. You should not have to support any of these statements. ><

A. Nicholas and Alexandra were the parents of a child who was in constant mortal peril. Alexei, their only son and heir was a hemophiliac. Often, their decisions were influenced by the stress put on them while trying to hide his condition, keep him alive, and run the largest nation in the world. In regards to their disdain for a constitutional monarchy, you cannot deny that things get done faster and with less buerocracy in an autocracy. Don't try to tell me you would want to deal with politicians while dealing with all the personal issues they were.

B. The Tzar and his family were killed because of the repercussions of WWI, not simply because it happened. However, the food shortages that the war caused provided the communist party the golden opportunity they needed to revolt. If Nicholas had not chosen to go to war on Serbia's behalf, food shortages would not have become so dire that communism seemed like a really good idea.

C. True fact. Though, he and his family might have been spared the horrific death they experienced if WWI had not occurred. The primary reason that the monarchy was overthrown in the first place was Alexei, through no fault of his own. His terrible condition kept Nicholas from being able to think rationally about many situations.

Answer 2

a. Nicholas was insensitive to the people, pure and simple.
He promised to respect a legislative body representing the people after the disastrous 1905 loss to Japan in the Russo-Japanese war, but then he failed to keep his promise.
Alexandra was little better. These were very rich, very privileged people who were accustomed to having everything their own way. In a word, they were "spoiled" - putting it in simplistic terms.
b. During WWI Nicholas was at the front leading the army (very badly) and Alexandra was home minding the country. She was more concerned with her small son who had hemophilia than she was with the people. There was almost certainly bad advice from the insane monk Rasputin who was thought, by Alexandra, to have some mystical healing powers to help her son.
c. This one is less clear. The war created an intolerable situation. I suspect the Tsar and his family may have survived a bit longer without that huge stress on the people and the country.

Answer 3

the ruler replaced into observed as a Tsar or each from time to time spelled Czar. The Tsar had complete ability over all of Russia. today the Tsar replaced into Nicolas II. He wasn't very sturdy at his interest, and there have been definatly some no longer so sturdy stuff happening lower than his rule. yet he replaced into an exceedingly sturdy guy and he loved the Russian human beings. yet Russia were given into WWI. the conflict dragged on plenty longer then it replaced into predicted to. Nicolas's son the Tsarevich Alexei (inheritor to the trown) had hemophilia (a diease that provents blood from clotting) he might want to die from a small scratch. He replaced into in a lot soreness so in many circumstances because of inturnal bleeding. his mothers and fathers got here upon a guy how might want to help him. he replaced right into a peasant named Rasputin. he lessend Alexei's soreness by utilizing praying over him. The Tsar and his spouse saved Alexei's ailment a secret from the persons of Russia because they didn't wish them to problem, so the persons did not understand why Rasputin replaced into round the royal relatives. The russians were puzzled and dissatisfied to ascertain this grimy guy with the royal relatives. They idea he replaced into attempting to get ability and that he replaced into utilizing the Tsar. the persons were mad at Nicolas for permitting Rasputin to have ability. It also did not help Nicolas's acceptance any that the conflict replaced into lasting so long and costing diverse lives. a set observed as the Bolsheviks took earnings of this susceptible time and imprisoned and brutally carried out the Tsar and his relatives. as for the type gadget. there replaced into an exceedingly vast wealth hollow. there have been diverse quite quite adverse pesants and some quite wealthy human beings. you've probable seen or heard of the lively movie Anastasia. this is about Nicolas's youngest daughter. yet its bull crap. Anastasia died with something of her relatives. yet their actual tale is rather thrilling, you should analyze it out. Anastasia receives diverse interest cuz there replaced right into a rumor she survived yet she did not and that i imagine she's rather stressful. verify out her sisters (Olga, Tatiana, and Marie) or her darling little brother. their very last call is Romanov.

Answer 4

his mindet was that he was tsar and he must rule. the people are the ruled and they must follow as a matter of course. this was not the case.

nicholas was perceived as a very weak monarch who failed to lead russia as other western states were blazing into modernization. he was old style ruler and was also adjudged as incompetent. he viewed ruling as an unwanted task given his very timid personality for which reason he allowed people like rasputin to advise and in effect to rule for him. this further alienated him from the people. on top of all of these, he was a very sensitive person and his sickly child took further much of his attention from the task of ruling. they were defeated in russojapanese war which was a big humiliation for russia