would you fully support the next liberal president regardless if you agree or disagree with their agenda?
2007-09-21 13:23:13 · 6 answers · asked by john_stolworthy 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Who? - I am assuming, then that you, unlike most conservatives, supported Clinton intervening into Kosovo. I'd take a look to see what you really think, but your Q&As are private.
2007-09-21 13:47:36 · update #1
Who? - I am assuming, then that you, unlike most conservatives, supported Clinton intervening into Kosovo. I'd take a look to see what you really think, but your Q&As are private.
2007-09-21 13:48:07 · update #2
Perfectly reasonable, easy to understand question and some people just won't get your point.
LMAO..
oh well
2007-09-21 13:48:39 · answer #1 · answered by BOOM 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Your premise is defective. outdoors of Bush's very superb courtroom nominations and his tax cuts i won't be in a position to think of of plenty else he has carried out suited. I help the continuation of the conflict because of the fact we ought to win it. The blunders that have been made battling it would be conquer, retreat in the face of fascism isn't an decision. That being suggested, i won't start to think of how undesirable issues may well be if Bush had lost the two the 00 or 04 election. Conservatives are people who think of. it does not be sensible to think of that Conservatives might blindly accept as true with each thing the candidate of our decision has carried out. Blind loyalty and sheepish habit is something undemanding on the left.
2016-11-06 01:05:49 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Did you mean to ask if I would support a conservative? Why would I support a liberal if they're against everything I consider patriotic? If A Lib waqs president, I would support whatever our country has decided to do. I would never undermine our war strategies or our commander in chief. I would not call our generals liars and question their integrity. I would not accuse him of conspiring to attack us, so that we can go after another country. I would not accuse him of being an idiot, unless I myself thought Americans were idiots. I would however, hold him responsiblew for the thngs he did that we can prove without speculation. And for the record, libs are the ones that usually get us in to these wars. And cons get the blame.
2007-09-21 13:29:49 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
no because the likely candidate is hillary and and considering the character already demonstrated as a willing participating member of the clinton...legacy, im unclear why the liberals even would think about giving her a pass. they may have "forgotten:" but i sure as xxxx havent.
- The only president ever impeached on grounds of personal malfeasance
- Most number of convictions and guilty pleas by friends and associates*
- Most number of cabinet officials to come under criminal investigation
- Most number of witnesses to flee country or refuse to testify
- Most number of witnesses to die suddenly
- First president sued for sexual harassment.
- First president accused of rape.
- First first lady to come under criminal investigation
- Largest criminal plea agreement in an illegal campaign contribution case
- First president to establish a legal defense fund.
- First president to be held in contempt of court
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions from abroad
- First president disbarred from the US Supreme Court and a state court
2007-09-21 14:37:17 · answer #4 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
repubs said clinton was wagging the dog when he bombed serbia. very anti-american.
2007-09-21 13:29:05 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
I bet they won't
2007-09-21 16:29:35 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋