To Ron Paul supporters.. Would you follow his footsteps and run for congress or senate?

Question

Please answer only if you are a Ron Paul supporter.

You know Congress and the Senate is in drastic short supply of people like Ron Paul.. Isn't it about time we fill the ranks with constitutionalists?

Which state would you run from?

Geomatic7000: the federal income tax was supposed to be 'temporary'. If you look at American history, the American Revolution started as a revolt to excessive taxation. The founding fathers thought 5% tax was excessive. Now, we have nearly 50% taxes from various kinds of taxes: state tax, local tax, sales tax, tobacco tax, gasoline tax, and the biggest tax of all: the federal income tax. You may not be 'aware' because you're used to paying these taxes. You should watch 'America from freedom to fascism' - it's available on google videos and youtube. It's educational.

Answer 1

There are a number of differences between Congress, the Senate and the House of Representatives, but they all function as the legislative branch of the federal government.

Essentially, Congress generates potential laws in a form known as a bill. A bill may start in the House of Representatives or the Senate, but it is not usually presented to the executive branch, i.e. the president, until both houses have worked out their differences over wording and intention of the proposed law.

When referring to the entire legislative branch, the proper collective term is Congress. Unlike the people who serve in the Senate or House of Representatives, the Congress as a whole exists for one year at a time. Historians may refer to the 87th Congress, for example, meaning those Senate and House members who met during that particular year. In that sense, "Congress" is a year-long event, while the Senate and House of Representatives buildings have existed for many decades.

One noticeable difference between the two houses of Congress is the number of members. The House of Representatives currently contains 435 members, one from each of 435 districts which represent portions of the states. States with a higher population are allotted more representatives than less populated states. These representatives serve two-year terms, meaning they could be up for re-election during every other Congress. The Senate, on the other hand, has 100 members, two from each state regardless of population. Senators serve six-year terms, with no term limitations.

Another difference between the House and Senate branches of Congress is the minimal eligibility requirements for election. In order to run for a seat in the House of Representatives, a candidate must be 25 years old, must have been a US citizen for at least 7 years and be a legal resident of the chosen state. To run for a Senate seat, however, a candidate must be 30 years old, and have been a US citizen for at least 9 years.

While the House of Representatives may reflect a wide spectrum of political views, from extremely liberal to extremely conservative, the Senate tends to be far less expansive. Members of Congress not only represent the wishes of their districts or states, but also their political parties' overall agenda. Members of the House of Representatives often form smaller factions based on similar political goals, gender, race or region of origin. Senators from the same state, however, may not even agree with each other politically. Support for bills pending in the Senate generally fall more reliably along political party lines than in the House of Representatives, where members may not feel as pressured to vote along party lines.

One noticeable difference between the Senate and House of Representatives is the amount of political clout. While House Representatives work hard to create laws and obtain government funding beneficial to their districts, they are not often viewed by their political parties as presidential material. Senators, on the other hand, have much more time to develop the sort of political support necessary to mount a presidential campaign. Therefore, a number of House Representatives will often run for open Senate seats in their states first, in order to position themselves for higher offices.

I do not desire to be president, therefore I would never go after a position within the Senate. However, I would give thought to claiming a seat within the House of Representatives pushing the same agenda as Ron Paul.

I believe the only way we, meaning America, will have a bright future is if Ron Paul can become our Commander-in-Chief.
Ron Paul 2008!

Answer 2

He seems to be OK, a moderate of sorts,but he doesn't seem to have the momentum that others do. I just heard about him 2 weeks ago and I'm trying to pay close attention to this thing. He might not get the support he wants because his name isn't as out there.

Also, I think he needs to stop the "no income tax" angle. I mean, come on. Its a fab idea, but I only support real ideas. I know a lot of politicians go in with flimsy promises but this is one of the flimsiest.

****I know l about the history of income tax from my own pursuits and being attacked and followed by a Ron Paul supporter on the way to my office. History repeats itself. we live in a greedy nation run by dictator wannabes. But if anyone thinks its going away now, they're a little delusional. If it happens I'll be impressed.

Answer 3

Americans are finally waking up after a long slumber and the spirit of '76 is rising. People are tired of getting pushed around by our government of thugs and mercenaries. "Do this", "don't say that". The government today is all about telling people what to do and how to live, and they rule through coercion and fear. Ron Paul offers an alternative: Liberty and love. The 2nd American revolution has begun!

Answer 4

I'd have to get some state-level legislative experience before embarking on something like that, but yes. First, though, we need to concentrate and turn all of this online support for Dr. Paul into actual votes in the primaries.

Answer 5

No, I have no interest in running for public office. There will be plenty to do to plan our new way of life after the announcements happen.

Answer 6

i would like to but , as a kid i did as i though , and still do so i have a record of civil disobedience

and i am proud of it

so i would never get elected

Answer 7

I would if I was an American, politics up here is too boring.