Nice guy, down to earth
2007-09-21 13:04:54
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
A remarkable man,by any standard. I thought his innocence was proven. The new age music tape in the bathroom had 45 minutes per side and ran out/shut off 10 minutes after the police arrived at 12:10. Whether the victim or assailant started the tape is irrelevent. Either way the tape was turned on at 11:35. At 11:35 Simpson's plane was rising from the runway. It is difficult to be in two places at once. Furthermore,the bathtub water was lukewarm and the victim's blood showed neglible congealment. These homicides transpired between 11:35 and 11:50. He was innocent. His former wife was clearly expecting someone that night for a sexual encounter; the police made no effort to identify this person - or why he never showed after the police arrived. it seems reasonable to rule out Simpson utterly,and to speculate that someone she met in a bar had been invited over,and she met her end at the hands of a serial killer who trolled bars looking for victims.
2007-09-21 13:00:57
·
answer #2
·
answered by Galahad 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Guilty then, guilty now.... arrogant as sin, and dumber then FOREST GUMP....if it wasn't for the fact that he had on a LATEX RUBBER GLOVE when the infamous leather glove "didn't fit so they acquit"... that glove WOULD HAVE FIT.... have you EVER tried to put leather over RUBBER? kind of difficult no matter how big the leather glove might be. On these new charges...even if he had EVERY RIGHT IN THE WORLD to go and take the sports stuff BACK, NONE of it was HIS because he owes the GOLDMAN's more money then ANY of that stuff was worth... if the stuff WAS stolen from anyone, the police SHOULD have handled it and if OJ is telling the truth about the stuff being stolen and the cops wouldn't believe him, then OJ should have gotten someone more believeable to talk to the cops and NOT try to handle it on his own. he was an IDIOT for even attempting that.
2007-09-21 12:57:07
·
answer #3
·
answered by LittleBarb 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
O.J. Simpson was a great football player. I admire his on-field accomplishments still.
But the man is emotionally disturbed. Maybe it's an obsessive-compulsive disorder; I don't know, I'm not a trained psychologist. But he definitely has a distorted sense of reality and an 'untouchable' ego problem.
I would hope that he gets help and that the public doesn't negate his football accomplishments because they happened a long time before his (known) legal troubles.
2007-09-21 12:57:50
·
answer #4
·
answered by Michael K 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Guilty
2007-09-21 12:53:51
·
answer #5
·
answered by R_Crumb_Rocks 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
He is a bold, brash man and I suspect (through being witness to his actions and listening at his attemps to speak) a stupid one. There is no doubt in my mind he is guilty of armed robbery, no matter what this idiot thinks he was doing. I am convinced as well he is the murderer of at least two people. Maybe this time justice will be served and some judge will throw this dope away for good.
2007-09-21 12:57:33
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
OJ Simpson is the classic sociopath.
He's narcissistic,shows no guilt or remorse for his actions,and thinks he is above the law.
And yes,I think OJ is guilty of murder,as well as the current charges he is up against.
2007-09-21 13:17:10
·
answer #7
·
answered by Candi Apples 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
My Christian witness and Yahoo rules would not allow me to express whatgI think of that poor excuse of a man. the athletes have an intense dislike of him according to a newspaper report yesterday.
2007-09-21 12:54:38
·
answer #8
·
answered by marlynembrindle 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Guilty
sociopath
2007-09-21 12:53:02
·
answer #9
·
answered by marie 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
I have said this before and I will say it again - Put him on a football field with 100 angry women and lets see what happens to him...Personally, I would pay for a ticket to that.
2007-09-21 12:53:55
·
answer #10
·
answered by CherryCheri 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Definitely Guilty! He is a lying murderer. I think his personality is that of a crazy person.
2007-09-21 12:53:31
·
answer #11
·
answered by Tink 3
·
2⤊
0⤋