2 Super Bowl appearances, 1 SB Ring, 2 NFL MVP awards, 1 SB MVP award, top-tier of QB records... but only 3 really good (incredible) years.
2007-09-21 11:40:44 · 16 answers · asked by Joe M 1 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
He's one of the best stories in the NFL ever (from supermarket to Super Bowl MVP) but not Hall worthy, unless he somehow puts in three more seasons with accomplishments similar to what you described.
2007-09-21 12:59:24 · answer #1 · answered by Tweet 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I really hope so i mean he's such a good guy. One year, when he was with the Giants i went to their training camp in Albany. At the end of the practice all the fans were standing at the exit of the practicefield to get autogeraphs. most of the guys just went rite by only signing a couple autographs (this was when the giants had just gotten Eli so every one wanted his autograph but he didn't sign any!!! he didn't even look at crowd. But Kurt staye there for one and a half hours singing. He shook my hand and asked how long i've been a giants fan. I feel bad for him cus when he got there the Giants line couldn't hold anyone so he kept getting hit and fumbling. All i'm saying is that he's a great guy.Hall of Fame. proboably not.
2007-09-21 12:32:16 · answer #2 · answered by futbol americano 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If I were a betting man, I doubt very seriously Kurt Warner will ever get into the Hall of Fame unless he pays for a ticket like the rest of us. He was a product of the system he played under when he was running the Greatest Show on Turf. He just doesn't have enough stats or number of productive years to put him over the top.
2007-09-21 13:08:17 · answer #3 · answered by davester1970 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I seriously doubt it. Even though he is a 3 time Pro Bowler, led the NFL in passing touchdowns in 1999 and 2001 and completions and passing yards in 2001 and had a lot of sucesss with the Los Angeles Rams I don't he will be inducted into Canton. He isn't in the top 50 all time in any major passing category (pass attempts, completions, passing yards or passing touchdowns). He has played in all 16 games in a season twice (1999 and 2001). Not including this season he has played in an average of 8-9 games per season throughout his career. Not HOF material.
2007-09-21 12:55:14 · answer #4 · answered by schaidog 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In addition to all the stuff you mentioned, here's one of Warner's records: he's the third-highest rated career passer - behind Steve Young (in the Hall) and Peyton Manning (likely will be in the Hall). I say Warner belongs in the Hall.
And Terrell Davis needs to be in the Hall as well. If you rush for 2,000 yards in a season, you should automatically get in. Simpson, Dickerson, and Sanders are in; Lewis is still playing.
2007-09-21 12:06:50 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
the hall of fame is for legendary players who play great football cinsistently. Kurt Warner was only a great player, not legendary or consistently. He was good back in his heyday, but just because you win a super bowl doesnt mean you get into the HoF (look at Trent Dilfer and Elvis Grbac for instance).
2007-09-21 13:21:55 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
As a fellow transplanted Iowan, it would be cool to see, but I doubt it.
Longevity is a big part of induction and that he unfortunately does not have.
I don't know where you are from, but here in the St Louis area, he is and always will be a GOD!! If it is any consolation for him, he can live in his home here (at least I think they still own their home here) for the rest of his life and live like royalty!!
2007-09-21 11:49:35 · answer #7 · answered by Patrick B 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely YES! Please folks, the Rams have never been the same since he departed and the Cardinals, while winning, have not been back either. Warner is an impact player. Great guy, great quarterback - 2017 he is in!
2016-01-24 16:09:46 · answer #8 · answered by Steve 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, probably not. I mean, for those three seasons, he was the best of the best, but it takes more than just three seasons. The HOF is made to immortalize the greats. We can clearly see by his steady decline over the last five seasons that he is, indeed, NOT great.
2007-09-21 11:49:27 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No you need more than 3 years.
2007-09-21 11:46:51 · answer #10 · answered by Patsfan 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋