Smackdown has a great roster.
Taker
Batista(hate him but he can be interesting sometimes)
Edge
Khali
Mysterio
Kane
Finlay
Mark Henrey
They also have better heels
MVP
Hardy
Chuck Palumbo
Chavo
Hornswoggle
more wrestling less storylines
the title changes more frequently than RAW obviously. Better commentors:
JBL and Cole
Better rivalries:
Batista vs. Taker was great.
Hardy vs. MVP is also fun to watch
Better GM
Teddy Long and Vickie Guerrero
What do u think?
2007-09-21 11:09:42 · 10 answers · asked by Himan23 4 in Sports ➔ Wrestling
They have a great roster but they don't use it
Smackdown < Raw < ECW
ECW has just carried WWE of late.
2007-09-21 11:15:54 · answer #1 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Smackdown is good, but I like Raw better.
2007-09-21 18:15:25 · answer #2 · answered by ♥Bmm♥ 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Chuck Palumbo, Hornswoggle, and Matt Hardy are not heels. I do agree with you, when healthy, Smackdown is my favorite show to watch.
2007-09-21 18:17:08 · answer #3 · answered by Man in the Box 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hornswoggle,Matt,&Palumbo are not heels...but yeah Smackdown is more entertaining to watch then ECW...
2007-09-21 18:16:57 · answer #4 · answered by The Masterpiece 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes i agree
they should throw khali away though
but raw i think has bigger name superstars
2007-09-21 18:16:02 · answer #5 · answered by zinko555 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i totally agree with u
2007-09-21 18:16:52 · answer #6 · answered by star baller 360 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i agree, and they have the hottest divas
2007-09-21 18:19:01 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
all the way
2007-09-21 18:17:04 · answer #8 · answered by hi 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
1.RAW
2.SMACKDOWN
Who gives a DAMN about ECW!!
2007-09-21 18:16:35 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
RAW~!!!!
2007-09-21 18:29:31 · answer #10 · answered by Kween*90'sKid 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋