I know that usually there is a link to some website story about Bush's sordid past, that was generated in a garage filled with old McGovern lawn signs so I am sorry to disappoint. Who knows, maybe some of you crazies will start typing a bunch of non-sense for no reason at all.
2007-09-21 10:10:56 · 18 answers · asked by jw 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Of course the question makes no sense. There is not even a message behind it. It is pure nonsense. I really just wanted to see who would find a way to respond with some sort of anger. Abortion guy down there takes the cake.
2007-09-21 10:17:47 · update #1
whats your point here? ranting? whatever.
2007-09-21 10:15:38 · answer #1 · answered by Agent 99 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
How come those babies and old peoples families don't take care of them?
Edit:
If a baby does not have family we should not of course just toss them to the side. Adoption & foster parents are needed.
How come those old people didn't plan their retirement?
Edit:
(I should add that as I have previously posted, if they don't have family to take care of them, I would be willing to allow my tax money go towards that)
Why do people like you blame it on everyone else except the most responsible party?
2007-09-21 17:17:40 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
People don't have to make up things about GWB, his record stands for itself. He likes the elderly (and big pharm). He gave them a 500 billion prescription drug benefit in 2005 that includes name brand drugs at full retail price (paid by the gov't). He likes kids, as long as they're not from the low income families who can't afford health insurance.
2007-09-21 17:18:45 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
You're wrong. Of course he likes them. Grilled over mesquite with a good rub on them, just like all conservatives do.
Because after a hard day of being a closet homosexual, oppressing blacks, spreading hate, oppressing Mexicans, committing genocide agianst Muslims, thumping our Nazi Bible and getting rich from Halliburton / Exxon there's nothing that fills you up like a nice barbecued grandma, with a side of baby salad.
Mmm mmm, now that's good eatin'.
2007-09-21 17:32:00 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
He just doesn't like paying for programs like SCHIP which could help millions more who would otherwise be ineligable for government-assisted healthcare. (His claims that the program is one step closer to being "federalized" is bunk. The program is ALREADY funded by both the state and the government through grants.)
2007-09-21 17:16:13 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Republicans tend to favor a vulgar extreme of materialism that has no use for real humanity.
Poor babies? Let 'em get a job and EARN their milk, by damn it!
Sick elders? Healthcare schmealthcare! NOTHING to cut into our buying a new vacation property!
The "Party of Life" they aint!
2007-09-21 17:20:00 · answer #6 · answered by Jim W 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I got two examples for you
Champ act
Legalized abortion
Liberal AGENDA
2007-09-21 17:20:29 · answer #7 · answered by Antiliber 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
what kind of a question is this? how do u know he dont like babies and old people.. better get your story togather..
2007-09-21 17:14:54 · answer #8 · answered by ~~~Buffy~~~ 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You will never find the true answer except if you talk to him.
2007-09-21 17:15:55 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You ranted. I don't agree with the premise of your question.
2007-09-21 17:14:58 · answer #10 · answered by regerugged 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
your question doesn't make much sense, certainly. Does that make you crazy?
2007-09-21 17:14:58 · answer #11 · answered by Lily Iris 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋