Can the right get it's collective story straight? I thought that George Soros ran the Democratic party. Now they say it's MoveOn.org. Who's next?
Isn't kind of silly to pass legislation against newspaper ads? What's next? "The ad for Transformers the movie is despicable! They completely skew the story toward the Autobots, running the good name of Megatron through the mud!"
Should I get mad that the Republicans don't condemn everyone on this site that posts a poorly photoshopped picture of a Democrat with a dumb pun on their name?
And since when does General Patreus= the troops? The hell he does. He is in charge of their well being, a duty he is ignoring in his attempt to be the uniformed ventriloquist's doll of the Bush regime.
2007-09-21 10:06:04 · 18 answers · asked by Schmorgen 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
You guys crack me up. When there's no relationship, just say there is and
Of course, it's not so funny when you realize that the same sort of fabrication about Iraq and Al Qaeda got us into a mess in the middle east.
How wonderful it must be to believe something solely because you want it to be true.
2007-09-21 10:47:27 · update #1
"George Soros" is actually right wing speak for "Vast Jewish, Muslim, Socialist, Atheist, GLBT, Feminist Left Wing Conspiracy".
2007-09-21 10:09:49 · answer #1 · answered by ck4829 7 · 5⤊ 5⤋
i'm shocked the Obamabots have not stated your query. Make no mistake, they are mocking you. Obama gained the fifty 5 uncommitted votes and four votes that rightfully belonged to Hillary. Hillary basically gained sixty 9 votes. suggestions you this basically counts as a one million/2 of a vote. As for Florida they chop up the vote 50/50. the recent delegate count quantity is 2118 and Obama has sixty 5 delegates to flow to realize that quantity on account that this "compromise". it fairly is a compromise that jogs my memory of the U.S. Constitutional Compromise to count quantity African descendants as 3/5ths of a guy or woman. MI and FLians count quantity as a one million/2. So, if it particularly is not resolved good on the Democratic national convention, VOTE with your ft for McCain or all and sundry else, yet not Obama. Obama is comfortable with one million/2 a vote. he's comfortable with your vote not being heard. Make him hear the deafening sound of your loss of help for him. Hillary for President '08!
2016-10-19 08:24:51 · answer #2 · answered by Erika 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What's the difference between the two? All you have to know is that it ain't the Democrats running the Democratic Party. They're all shakin' in their boots that someone will turn the money tap off. The only one who has any balls (literally) is Clinton because she's still getting a major part of her funding from the Chinese. She's been sold so many times she has a bar code on the back of her neck for easy scanning.
2007-09-21 10:37:41 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
Just like a lib to not admit to the truth...Just like Bill didn't have sex with Monica! Move on and Soros control the purse strings for the demoncrates.Yesterdays hippies are todays todays traitors.
2007-09-21 11:13:23 · answer #4 · answered by ak6702 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Lets explain it real simple Skippy.
Soros controls the Democrat party AND Moveon.org.
Savvy?
2007-09-22 13:28:42 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Soros is anti-american and move on is anti-american.Soros funds move on and and move on funds the democrats. If you call 300 million dollars to the kerry camp. is pocket change,then you need to get your research straight.Solcialism is not Democracy,if Soros wins WE ALL LOSE.
2007-09-21 10:43:21 · answer #6 · answered by jakeright 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Investors Business Daily has an editorial today on George Soros well worth reading. Here's a bit:
... since 2003, tearing down what he views as the "fascist" tyranny of the United States, as he has put it, is "the central focus of my life."
Through networks of nongovernmental organizations, Soros intends to ruin the presidency of George W. Bush "by any legal means necessary" and knock America off its global pedestal. "His view of America is so negative," says Sen. Joe Lieberman, who, like Gen. David Petraeus, has been a target of Soros' electoral "philanthropy." "The places he's put his money are . . . so destructive that it unsettles me." Soros' aim seems to be to make the U.S. just another client state easily controlled by the United Nations and other one-world groups where he has lots of friends.
2007-09-21 10:19:42 · answer #7 · answered by CaptainObvious 7 · 4⤊ 3⤋
Soros runs "some" of the democrats, MoveOn pulls the strings on Soros .
The General is the "troops" when you decide that the uniform in charge of them doesn't represent them, well then you lose (like Moveon) ANY credibility.
2007-09-21 10:12:46 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 4⤋
Your trolley has completely jumped the track. George Soros funds MoveOn. He is the goofy leader of an equally goofy group.
You asked way too many questions. You are cheating. You only got charged five points. We do not like cheaters.
2007-09-21 10:13:54 · answer #9 · answered by regerugged 7 · 3⤊ 4⤋
It's all a pile of rubbish - the cons pin everything on Soros - but ask them for some evidence and they'll come up with nothing.
There is no connection - hell I could be the big bad liberal funding monster based on the evidence they have. Lol!
2007-09-21 10:17:55 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 4⤋
That's the problem with those Democrats - they just allow too much freedom, liberty and dissonance.
2007-09-21 10:21:07 · answer #11 · answered by Ben 5 · 5⤊ 2⤋