English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Which processor would you prefer in your desktop or laptop?

2007-09-21 07:36:55 · 4 answers · asked by Tom S 7 in Computers & Internet Other - Computers

4 answers

I like my AMD processors they will out perform intel normally but tend to build up more heat and Turion is AMDs Mobile processor which is ideal for laptops on battery life. centrino is Intels mobile processor and it will run a bit cooler but for as perfromance AMD will normally out perform but for most users you want see much a difference it basically personal opinion some people like chevy other like ford . same with Intel vs AMD Intel core 2 is dual core processing where AMD will be Amd 64x2 for there dual core names. both are good processors

2007-09-21 08:21:39 · answer #1 · answered by c.c. 3 · 0 0

in all probability the middle 2 a million.5 would be tremendously on the factor of the Turion a million.9 because of the fact the middle 2 can do greater paintings consistent with cycle than the Turion (and the middle 2 might additionally be slightly speedier). The center 2 Duo provides you with greater advantageous battery existence although (assuming the different aspects do no longer use greater potential and the two desktops have a similar length battery). the only with the Intel processor has a much bigger confusingpersistent it particularly is a sturdy element and a fingerprint reader collectively as the AMD does not seem to have one (i've got chanced on a fingerprint reader to be severe-high quality to have although i does no longer determine based completely on that element). the great issue i might say may be what snap shots each and each of them has, if the only with the middle 2 has Intel snap shots it particularly isn't any longer particularly any sturdy for gaming (and if it does not have Intel snap shots it particularly is going to be) yet with AMD structures you will be able to desire to be plenty greater careful because of the fact that multiple the nVidia and aTi chips that pass into AMD laptops are even worse than Intel snap shots (and it particularly is often the cheapies that have the undesirable ones). From what i will tell decision a million may be the two Intel integrated crap (although the X3100 is the least worst Intel snap shots chip ever) or a GeForce 8400 it particularly is a sturdy chip. the 2d seems to have an old GeForce 6200 (although you ought to verify) it particularly is slightly dated now and a google seek indicated a good number of folk unhappy with that distinctive style. As for Vista, collectively because it particularly is crap and could be prevented if in any respect attainable you probable won't get too plenty decision interior the issue.

2016-10-05 03:20:53 · answer #2 · answered by bedlion 4 · 0 0

Neither...

I have an AMD AM2 Athlon FX Dual Core in my destop. I have a moble AMD 1.6GHz chip in the 2 year old laptop that may or may not be a Turion.

Intel is a nice stock to own...it's chips aren't necessarily as good as claimed. I still have yet to hear if they ever fixed that floating point error that plagued them back in the mid 90's. :D

That and Intel just took a MAJOR hit in the EU for Unfair Business Practices, and one in the US(?) for "Encouraging" companies to not produce AMD compatable equipment.

Mix in the fact that you can buy an equivalent AMD chip for up to several hundreds of dollars less (the current AMD top chip is the Athlon 6000+ at $4-500, and it wipes the floor with Intel's more expensive $1000 top chip!).

2007-09-21 08:02:53 · answer #3 · answered by jcurrieii 7 · 0 0

intel core 2 is more efficient then AMD turion

2007-09-21 07:50:50 · answer #4 · answered by AAK 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers