2007-09-21 07:11:17 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
He was a progressive reformer. He was considered a conservative democrat, but history has shown he had many liberal ideas for his time frame. He also had a similarity to today's' liberals that he avoided war, which by the way, we ended up in despite his efforts. So in today's rhetoric he would be considered communist, yes.
2007-09-21 07:20:22 · answer #1 · answered by libsticker 7 · 3⤊ 4⤋
The truth is he was an eastern Christian with liberal ties to the Ivy League elite which still is running our country.
He allowed the rich democrats of the east who had many investments in Turkey with their schools, land and other things they used to help the Armenians but when push came to shove. These elites thought they could keep Sultan Hammed Abdul II to keep from committing genocide and could save their investments.
We see the same things today with liberals as they never learn from their mistakes. And Wilson went to his grave trying to right his wrong by not doing what his ambassadors begged him to do by intervening and crushing the Turks. So he went across the US on a train trying to get support for the league of nations and protect his wrongs.
Today the left is worse than Wilson in they are narcissist of the highest level who can do no wrong and will hug and embrace a Muslim like Columbia U is doing with mach mod Amedimajad of Iran by forcing their students to hear this hate monger of the devil who thinks and promises to bring about the end of the world so his 12th imam can return and what is left on earth can be his slaves under Shari’s ;law.
OK lib's face it you are all communist traitors and will have to pay when we are hit again and you may not pray but you might want to pray they do not hit our schools and children as then there will be no place to run as you are all traitors and will have to answer for it.
2007-09-21 07:42:25 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Yup. Anything he could do to give the government / ruling-class more power over the people, he did it. Communist revolutions hit the world in 1913 and he embraced the model.
But pay no attention, we are a two party system and when the government sponsored corporations oppress the people, we should blame capitalism and give the government that created them more power.
Honestly, its the only logical way to explain how we got to where we are today. I know people don't want to hear it, which is why you'll hear it from me instead of someone who wants to get elected.
2007-09-21 07:40:50 · answer #3 · answered by freedom first 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Miss AMerica calling one of our President COmmunist??? LOL.
Nothing I know would characterize him as a commie.
2007-09-21 07:56:01 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
NO if anything he was a capitalist who screwed up America by signing the federal reservist banking act.
2007-09-21 07:31:27 · answer #5 · answered by smedrik 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
He was a righteous idiot but not a communist. It's possibe to be one and not the other. Really.
2007-09-21 07:19:39 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Depends........ does he agree with every thing that current day Conservatives say. Because if he didn't, then by their standards he is a Communist.
2007-09-21 07:19:47 · answer #7 · answered by truth seeker 7 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Not sure, but FDR was a communist sympathizing socialist.
Just research the "New Deal", very socialist.
2007-09-21 07:18:06 · answer #8 · answered by Adolf Schmichael 5 · 5⤊ 3⤋
He was a believer in the eugenics programs, and supported much of their actions.
2007-09-21 07:33:54 · answer #9 · answered by Steve C 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Um, I don't think so. Why do you ask about somebody who's been dead for so many years now?
2007-09-21 07:17:08 · answer #10 · answered by samans442 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋