700,000 casualties, millions of refugees, millions of displaced people, destruction of 2 countries, producing hatred, prejudice, intolerance and discrimination worldwide. Can we see again liberalism and tolerance?
2007-09-21 05:28:50 · 10 answers · asked by albandazole 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Write on the blackboard 2 000 times: Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden had nothing to do with one another and Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11.
2007-09-21 05:33:29 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 8⤊ 1⤋
Osama is responsible for 911 and the Afghanistan Wars. He had nothing to do with Iraq. That was something the Bush administration cooked up. If they had not been distracted by starting an unrelated war they may have been able to finish the job and Osama would now be history.
2007-09-21 05:51:18 · answer #2 · answered by wyldfyr 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Osama is responsible for Sep 11. Bush is responsible for Iraq and Afghanistan wars. A different president would not have invaded Iraq. The invasion of Iraq was just about their oil.
2007-09-21 05:40:47 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
Osama is a friend of the Bush family. and USA....and he's Saudi not Iraqi or Afghani...he's OK...Look at this.
.Is the USA planning to go to war with Iran to preserve the Petrodollar Cycle?
This video is long but really interesting. Also will the world be a safer and more peaceful place after the US goes bankrupt and is no longer a Superpower.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k1opefa9l...
2007-09-28 12:50:04 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No. Bin Laden was responsible for Sept. 11, the original World Trade Center bombing, the USS Cole, the bombing of our embassy in Africa.
He had nothing to do with Iraq. Sadly, this one is 100% on George W. Bush, as was his failure to win Afghanistan and secure the border with Pakistan.
Impeach
2007-09-21 05:44:49 · answer #5 · answered by Big Momma Carnivore 5 · 4⤊ 0⤋
I'd lay Sept 11 and invading Afghanistan to look for him on him. But Iraq?
That is where most people are scratching their heads and why Bush's popularity has fallen so much. Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11 or Osama.
2007-09-21 05:35:41 · answer #6 · answered by joker 4 · 7⤊ 1⤋
Indeed, I get the feeling that Osama, or at least my notion of who he is, continues to be thrilled with the outcomes and implications of those two buildings collapsing in New York. September 11th was like a mid-oceanic earthquake. The damage actually done by the event itself didn't even compare to the damage done by the waves it created.
-The media and government frenzy over sensationalizing 9/11esque terror-inducing stories
-Fear grips the masses and overrules their better judgment
-The President proudly speaks against the acts
-The administration takes us into an endless "war," supposedly against an invisible enemy
-The public becomes much more politically divided, but surely no smarter
Any anti-American terror mastermind must just giggle about the sequence of events post-9/11/01.
2007-09-21 05:32:42 · answer #7 · answered by Buying is Voting 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
People don't even know what liberalism and conservatism mean anymore. I'm baffled how people, who claim to be conservative, can allow our government to ignore the Constitution everyday; or how liberals can show such intolerance for religious freedom and majority rule everyday. People, like me, don't know which way to turn anymore, because the cons are not conservative and the libs are not liberal. Meanwhile, we all wonder why we can't get our government to do a damned thing right.
2007-09-21 05:39:13 · answer #8 · answered by Crystal Blue Persuasion 5 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Your question doesn't make any sense. That pig anus Osama and his bed-buddy al-Zahwiri are responsible for 9/11, along with the swine who flew the planes, assisted with coordination, funding, aiding. May they feast for eternity on Satan's toejam.
2007-09-21 05:35:59 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
osama has nothing to do with the war in iraq.
2007-09-21 05:35:36 · answer #10 · answered by nostradamus02012 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋