2007-09-21 04:54:39 · 19 answers · asked by Riiich 1 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Astronomy & Space
It would be arrogance in the extreme to believe that Earth was the only planet to support life in the Milky-Way. Amongst those hundred-billion stars, there must be several orbiting planets with life on-board.
So far there is no proof, the Wow Signal of 15th August 1977 was never confirmed or repeated. (Near Nunki in Sagittarius)
Within the next two decades the proof will come, that unmistakeable confirmation; that we are not alone.
2007-09-22 14:00:29 · answer #1 · answered by Tropic-of-Cancer 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the chocolate men live in the milky way galaxy
2007-09-21 05:53:50 · answer #2 · answered by Boney 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
We do not know and there is every possibility that we will never know. However there is a strong possibility that at least a few planets have some life. But whatever might be alive on some other planet might only be bacteria. For most of the history of life on Earth, life here was only bacteria too.
2007-09-21 05:11:51 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is probably life but the chance of finding intelligent life that is anywhere near our evolution is extremely slim. The odds are that any life we find will be so far behind us as to be prehistoric or so far ahead of us that we will seem prehistoric. Man has only been around less than a million years and the universe has been around for billions.
*
2007-09-21 05:03:04 · answer #4 · answered by Barkley Hound 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Hey there I like your question and I absolutely promise I Will look at it properly later (in fact I think I have got a good link for you) but at the minute I am just regaining some points that ya took away from me as easy as that and now with this response I have got them back so thank you
Edit: It's a long shot but I just hope that those two little losers who gave this answer the thumbs down come back and finish the job and press REPORT. You wouldn't dare do anything like that in real life you gutless anonymous wimps. Does it make ya feel important?
2007-09-21 05:03:23 · answer #5 · answered by Blokheed 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
i think you mean life not live
and there should be a "the" in the " in milky way" part
and to answer the question.........
no one knows
there might be,
there might not be
2007-09-21 05:53:40 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
ALTHOUGH ONE CAN NEVER BE SURE UNLESS YOU MEET UP, BUT IF 1%OF ALL THE TYPE G DWARF STARS(WHAT OUR SUN IS) IN THE KNOWN UNIVERSE HAVE PLANETS AND 1% OF THOSE HAVE LIFE ON THEM, WE'D STILL HAVE A LOT OF EXTRA-TERRESTRIAL LIFE OUT THERE. THE PROBLEM IS THE DISTANCE WHICH MAKES INTERSTELLAR TRAVEL ALMOST A FOREGONE IMPOSSIBILITY.
2007-09-21 05:03:35 · answer #7 · answered by Loren S 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Potentially on Europa, but we have yet to discover a confirmation of that and of course there are other places which we are far away from even sending an unmanned ship to survey.
2007-09-21 05:00:53 · answer #8 · answered by NY PTK 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
'Milky Way'? 'Galaxy'? 'Live'?
Is this an advert for chokkies, a promo for a concert or a stupid question?
Answers on a postcard to.....
2007-09-21 05:02:40 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
life must exist elsewhere in our galaxy,to suggest anything else would be ludicrous
2007-09-23 07:33:14 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋