I think it is major but the Mainstream media, the liberal blogs and the democratic party will stuff it enough that the true ramifications of it will never be known to us since it would jeopardize the Democrats run for offices in 2008.
2007-09-22 06:40:49
·
answer #1
·
answered by ALASPADA 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
Not very far, to answer your question in a direct manner.
Now to address the inanity of your question:
Funny how the righties get their panties all in a bunch about campaign contributions all of a sudden.
Ever hear of a guy named Jack Abramoff?
What about the $100K he raised for Bush (that wasn't returned)?
Maybe they can get cells next to each other in Who Gives A S**T State Prison.
The answer, obviously, is to take the money out of elections. Make a base donation to the US treasury manditory to run, say $400 Million. This money is then meted out for the candidates and the best ideas, not the best fundraisers, win the day.
2007-09-21 04:27:58
·
answer #2
·
answered by Schmorgen 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
where's the conspiracy ?
It's obvious you don't know the definition of conspiracy...
"Then why is Hillary returning the money BUT asking people to re-donate it " - So do you have any links or information to support this claim, or did you just make that up like most all trolls do ?
give me a break already with the Hsu crap...!
You think any candidate opens the mail or cashes the checks personally ?...do think any candidate does a background check on people sending them money ?..that's naive don't you think ?
This is exactly why Republican's will lose in 08'....
focusing on the wrong issues, and distorting the facts as usual....
2007-09-21 04:19:26
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
Hillary is returning the money but she refuses to reveal the list of names that were the conduit for it.
If the FEC doesn't freak out I will struggle with whether or not I should be surprised.
2007-09-21 04:15:46
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
It doesn't matter how far it goes...the press will all but ignore the story and in a few months you'll never hear about it again....I just hope if she wins she brings back the silverware that she stole from the last time she was in the white house...
2007-09-21 04:34:13
·
answer #5
·
answered by greatrightwingconspiritor 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
THIS IS-IS- about a TYPICAL politician, taking TYPICAL political campaign "Donations" from just another TYPICAL lobbyist!!!
I dislike this HILLARY NUT to the max, BUT why just point fingers at her??? THE TOP 97% of politicians GLADLY TAKE, and in fact INCOURAGE, LOBBYIST TO "DONATE", MILLIONS of $, constantly !!!!
toro gringo
2007-09-21 04:42:25
·
answer #6
·
answered by NONAME 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Given that her majesty is a micro-manager all the way to the top. Does anyone really think that she didn't know who was standing next to her in the photo and fund raiser? Her organization would vet them and the secret service would have vetted them. She knew.
schmorgen who decides who has the best ideas and gets the money?
2007-09-21 04:15:43
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
The monks Will give them the money again and claim to have no more earthly belonging like they did in the 90's.
2007-09-21 04:46:11
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think he'll be tried and convicted of fraud, and if we're lucky this scandal will light a fire under the proponents of campaign finance reform and spending limits.
2007-09-21 04:12:58
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
Uh, Earnest, its fallen flat.
Hillary gave back $850k when she laerned of Hsu's record.
ALL politicians ask for donations. Duh.
Only she wants CLEAN money!
Would you even post this if she were a Republican?
2007-09-21 04:14:36
·
answer #10
·
answered by Jim W 3
·
2⤊
2⤋