2007-09-21 03:20:42 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
No. Both parties have donations from organizations whose only goals are to discredit the other party.
2007-09-21 03:30:09 · answer #1 · answered by Lisa M 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
No, we should elect a president based on the individuals qualifications, abilities to do the job. Moveon.org actually contributes to campaigns of other then Democrats. The beliefs of a political action group are not necessarily the beliefs of any one party.
2007-09-21 10:33:43 · answer #2 · answered by fangtaiyang 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Can someone tell me what in the hell makes one radical form of media insulting a general ( which I think is wrong ) different from another form of radical media insulting a Senator? Or a President? I never listen to Rush Limbaugh but I am pretty damn sure he insults Democratic Senators all the time. Should we vote Democrat because of that? By the way, I have never been to moveon.org either.
2007-09-21 10:51:58 · answer #3 · answered by grumpyoldman 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
If Hilliary gets the nomination, you'll hear alot worse than a pun on a name, there'll be sex puns, family puns, insults on a former president and every good American is meant to forget the outrage on right wing talkshows about this incident. The good General is hardly rattled by a comment by any Organisation, he's trying to rebuild a country and facing an enemy that thinks he is the Great White satan and sending suicide bombers out hunting for mass killings.
In simple you:-
Vote for the person most suited and able to do the job.
2007-09-21 10:32:12 · answer #4 · answered by Bear F 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Absolutely not, we should elect a President that is going to serve in the best interest of the American people, period. The ad may cause controversy, but when it comes to the election it is irrelevant, now the ties to moveon by Obama and Hillary, well if you want a President that is handicapped, bought and paid for, then you got your answer.
2007-09-21 10:28:31 · answer #5 · answered by libsticker 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Haven't the Democrats shown what they are made of? This just puts the icing on the cake! To denounce a 4 star General that has devoted his life to his country. A true leader should be honored and not disgraced. This is the character of the Dems? And Hillary to vote for the ad in Moveon.org, instead of condemning it? It just gives me reaffirmation of my Conservative beliefs. I don't agree with Socialism and I believe in our military men and women.
Fred in '08!
2007-09-21 10:36:38 · answer #6 · answered by Moody Red 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Not only did that group insult a general, they accused him of betraying everything that he works for.
And no, we shouldn't elect a Republican president solely based on that. We should elect the best person for the job. Period.
2007-09-21 10:25:02 · answer #7 · answered by Captain Moe 5 · 6⤊ 2⤋
there are many other reasons to elect a republican. but this group seems to be calling the shots and there is no telling what misdeeds they could accomplish with a Dim in the white house.
2007-09-21 10:36:35 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
No we should elect a Republican president because those leading the democratic race refuse to defend our military from unfounded attacks.
2007-09-21 10:24:38 · answer #9 · answered by gerafalop 7 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Nope.
We should elect a Republican because it's the right thing to do.
For that matter we should elect a Democrat if THAT's the right thing to do. I think Truman was the last one.
As for MoveOn.org vs. the US Army, I don't know about you but my money is on the Army.
2007-09-21 10:25:52 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 2⤋
I'm a conservative, and I'll answer with no: MoveOn's antics aren't enough to demand a Republican leader. We've got way better reasons than that!
2007-09-21 10:28:54 · answer #11 · answered by Pfo 7 · 5⤊ 0⤋