2007-09-21 02:56:24 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Well....yeah!!
What's sad about the whole issue is that what occurred was a criminal issue. Six people gang up to beat up one! Was the bottom line issue over a racially oriented issue...maybe so...and that issue should be addressed, however, resorting to violence is not the answer.
Martin Luther King Jr. was clear in his efforts that violence is not the answer....I agree with his tactics.
Had the victim and offenders been reversed in this case...would there have been as much uproar over the matter...would be interesting to know!
Best wishes.
2007-09-21 03:04:28 · answer #1 · answered by KC V ™ 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
That’s actually a pretty good question but really irrelevant.
Each of these are separate incidents and I for one will not integrate the 2.
I don't know if OJ did it or not, and unfortunately no one will ever know. The case really isn't for me to judge, Oj will be judged one day by god, as it should be.
As for the Jena case, it's obvious these kids deserve to be charged for there actions but an attempted murder charge is ludicrous.
2007-09-21 03:10:47 · answer #2 · answered by labken1817 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
probably.
They are the biggest hypocrits. They are complete racists.
The guys are criminals. They severely beat a kid up.
If it was the other way around, there would be no one there to protest.
Soooo sick of the race card thats always played. Anyone who plays is is a rascist.
2007-09-21 03:06:53 · answer #3 · answered by WWJD 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That's the most ridiculous statement I think I've ever heard!
NO
Do you have children? Would you like YOUR kid to receive 100 years in jail for a fight in which nobody was seriously hurt even?
Your words make you seem ignorant and racist. Nobody needs that kind of attitude these days.
2007-09-21 03:05:10 · answer #4 · answered by I_Hate_Stupidity 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No, new generation. These are the ones that wanted the Duke kids hung.
2007-09-21 03:06:10 · answer #5 · answered by grumpyoldman 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋