Surely that would be a more appropriate term for the ethnic cleansing of the native Arabs from Palestine in order to create a Jewish colonial state in its place?
2007-09-21 02:44:23 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Yes
2007-09-21 02:50:20 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
Judeofascism is considered an ethnic slur while Isamofascism is not. The reason is simply that Islamofacism is the logical result of thorough application of islamic law. Islam is political by nature, and Mohammed was brutal ruler. Islamic fundamentalists want to re-created Mohammeds rule in Media, which was totalitarian. As Hassan Al Banna, founder of the Muslim Brotherhood, said: "Islam is very similar to Nazism". The term Judeofacism is an attempt by the politically indoctrinated mass media to create a counterpart to the concept of "Islamofacism". This is of course nonsensical, since the government of Israel is democratic and modern and protects the rights of non-Jews. Jewish religious fundamentalists have no political ambition themselves, so a Jewish state run by the bearded nutcases is pure fiction. Islamofascism governmental; you can see it applied in all theocracies where the Koran is the constitution and Shariah is the laws. The high death created by militant Muslims (20,000 terrorist attacks world-wide since 2000 and that is a random starting point) is real, whereas the so-called "aggression" from Judeofascists (aka the IDF) is fundamentally a response to endless attacks on Israel by the likes of Hamas, Hizb-Allah and Fatah. But according to the mass media, they are equivalent.
2016-05-20 00:12:36 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
While the state of Israel does have problems with human rights violations and conflicts with moral ground on some of its actions, it does not nearly approach the danger it faces from Islamic terrorists and the nations that support them. In an ideal world, Israel would not behave as such, there would be no need. Given the current climate, Israel has every right to take steps to defend itself. How far it crosses over the moral line is up to Israel to decide.
2007-09-21 03:02:07 · answer #3 · answered by SteveA8 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
It was already described as Judeofascism by USSR Politburo and Anti-Zionist Jewish Committee in 1960s.
2007-09-21 03:00:02 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
No, and there is no "ethnic cleansing of Native Arabs," nor is there a "Jewish colonial state."
2007-09-21 02:55:22 · answer #5 · answered by ddey65 4 · 2⤊ 3⤋
"Don't talk like that! When people criticize Zionists, they mean Jews. You're talking anti-Semitism!" - Martin Luther King
Israel was there long before Mohammad was a twinkle in his fathers eye. The Muslims drove them out first by the sword.
2007-09-21 02:58:00 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
No.
Its the Arabs who have vowed to push the Jews into the sea.
Its the Arabs who send in suicide bombers.
There are still Arabs in Israel.
You are completely in error.
2007-09-21 02:51:32 · answer #7 · answered by justa 7 · 3⤊ 4⤋
Israel has the 4th most powerful military in the world and nukes, but they are the lamb being attacked by wolves. RIIIIGHT.
2007-09-21 02:56:35 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
Ethnic cleansing? I think of it more as pest control.
2007-09-21 02:50:09 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋
I supported apartheid in South Africa and I support it in Israel. American should look to them as role models.
2007-09-21 02:57:21 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋