Aoccdrnig to rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoatnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be at the rghit pclae. The rset can be a toatl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit a porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe.
so no more complaining about SPELL CHECK! lol
2007-09-21 00:16:36 · 31 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
honestly.. I had never seen it before and found it interesting. sorry for posting something that was "played" out.
:)
2007-09-21 00:28:38 · update #1
yes and btw its a hoax Cambridge NEVER did this study
http://www.mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk/~mattd/Cmabrigde/
2007-09-21 00:21:40 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
Yes. It says According to research at Cambridge University , it doesn't matter what order the letters in a word are, the only important thing that the first and last letter be at the right place. The rest can be a total mess and you can read it without a problem. This is because the human mind does not read every letter by itself, but the word as a whole.
2007-09-21 00:23:38 · answer #2 · answered by Max A 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
According to research at Cambridge University, it doesn't matter in what order the letters in a word are, the only important thing is that the first and last letter be at the right place. The rest can be a total mess and you can still read it without a problem. This is because the human mind does not read every letter by itself, but the word as a whole.
2007-09-21 00:19:21 · answer #3 · answered by k i w i ♥182 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
If you thought the spelling of that paragraph was bad,you should try reading the letters and journals from the 17th and mid - 18th centuries. The people wrote however they felt like and so it is more than a little frustrating to figure out what if anything they were trying to say. The spelling improved once people began to agree on how words should be spelt (instead of haphazard, this was in the late 18th century).Noah Webster knew that for Americans to be Americans we needed our own language, so he undertook the monumental task of changing England's english to American english.Which I think is easier to understand and to read. Thank God for Noah Webster !
2007-09-21 00:44:31 · answer #4 · answered by Bronte 1512 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
According to research at Cambridge University, it doesn't matter in what order the letters in a word are, the only important thing is that the first and last letter be at the right place. The rest can be a total mess and you can read it without a problem. This is because the human mind does not read every letter by itself, but the word as a whole.
2007-09-21 00:23:45 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
actuality a million: Ravan killed innocents, ok. yet who's Ram to punish him? Ram has his own organisation organisation in Ayodya easily. particular you're quite ideal. Ram didnt punish Ravan for killing Innocents. He Punished him because of the reality Ravan abducted his significant different (Mata) Sita. As prince and robust warrior Ram punished Ravan. Statment 2: Vaali and sugriva have been brothers. they on the on the spot at the instant are not human beings. what's the will of Rama to kill Vaali, a beast? correct In those days Kings went for looking. in the comparable way Ram Hunted Vaali the Monkey Beast. ================================== quite own Opinion toddler splendor
2016-11-06 00:52:09 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Actually, the reason we can read it has nothing to do with how it in interpreted but by reading questions and answers on Y/A, by people who are used to doing so much text messaging that they have forgotten how to spell. Or that typing wasn't there best skill in school.
2007-09-21 05:19:09 · answer #7 · answered by ♫ Bubastes, Cat Goddess♥ 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes not olny can I raed it I can wirte it! Tihs is the tirhd tmie I've raed tihs tdaoy.How mnay mroe tmies do you tinhk it wlil be on hree?But as awlyas I siltl fnid it itnesrtenig.
2007-09-21 00:25:08 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yes, I could read it and at a fast pace. This I knew before about reading the whole word. Very informative.
2007-09-21 02:55:24 · answer #9 · answered by Irish 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I can read it, and I will soon learn it by heart....
I have seen this question posted at least 3 times in the past 2 weeks.... it's a good point, but it is loosing originality!
2007-09-21 00:25:39 · answer #10 · answered by Red Head Angel 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
How would Miss Teen South Carolina respond to this?
2007-09-21 00:22:35 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋