Haha... Better get used to it!
2007-09-20 22:44:51 · 20 answers · asked by Belzetot 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Typical cons... Can't even spell or make sense.
2007-09-20 22:50:10 · update #1
Republicans, as displayed by their leader Mr. Bush, are characteristically delusional.
2007-09-20 23:35:38 · answer #1 · answered by Negligence 3 · 4⤊ 3⤋
"Typical cons", you do realize that the prefix "con" means "together".
Typical together. Yeah, that makes sense.
I wouldn't be surprised if Hillary is elected. The slave mongering anti-civil rights Democrats would do anything to put a puppet girl in office.
In fact, Hillary's Iraq rhetoric sounds a lot like the rhetoric Democrats spouted during the civil war just before they assassinated Lincoln and took the oval office so they could begin their long campaign against civil rights by vetoing the original civil rights act and over turning the executive orders providing lands and monies to former slaves.
It would not surprise me if Hillary embarked on a series of actions against the people of Iraq very similar to those of President Andrew Johnson took against the former slaves.
I doubt if they will start lynching Iraqis in the streets of New York city the way Democrats lynched blacks, but, they will probably take some kind of similar actions.
History has shown that those who refuse to learn from their mistakes repeat them and Democrats have maintained their hate of the idea of liberating people from slavery.
2007-09-20 23:37:49 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
Hsu's Hillary's daddy?
Hillary doens't even have the full support of her party. Democrats will not be motivated to get out and vote for Hillary - who has already betrayed them by authorizing the use of force in Iraq and generally not giving into the irrational nutrtoots base.
Rudy will be our next President. He is America's Mayor until he becomes America's President.
To further complicate the Democrats mess any progress in Iraq will cost them votes.
The Democrats are tied to defeat in Iraq - and hitching your wagon to America's defeat is a pretty stupid strategy for 2008 and all points beyond.
2007-09-20 23:27:54 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
i don't think of this is a "guy sufficient" venture, i think of this is a historic previous venture. think of approximately it, undergo in concepts all of the subject concerns, lies and deceit that went on in the time of the Clinton administration? The Clinton administration signed onto NAFTA and our usa has suffered ever in view that. it could have carried out plenty extra to guard our boarders and our usa, yet, it did not. there have been infinite different subject concerns too dissimilar to point right here. we are paying a expensive cost for that overlook and indifference of that administration. Why might we, as a rustic, be stupid sufficient to vote in the spouse of the comparable guy who worked so stressful to do our usa in? do we actually need this style of mentality in the White homestead lower back? he would be working it from a budget seats, not her. She has already reported that he will play a great area in "her administration". properly, persons, feels like the cost of cigars would be off the charts lower back.
2016-11-06 00:47:50 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
She will need to erase the 45% negative rating she has. Her campaign needs to be about making her look more appealing to the voters. I know many people who will vote for the Republican candidate as a vote against Hillary. Bill was a fairly good president, but her ideas are a little more far fetched than his. She will need to prove to me in the campaign that she is worthy of my vote.
2007-09-21 00:09:39 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'm not a Republican but there will be no United States if Hillary becomes president, therefore the question is irrelevant.
2007-09-20 22:54:46 · answer #6 · answered by qwert 7 · 6⤊ 0⤋
Well, if one of Hillary's minions happens to parasitically attach an amnesty provision on to, lets say, a DoD bill, then yeah, she might get the illiterate, illegal vote.
I know.....
not very original of me since Dicky Durbin tried this very thing last week under the guise of the 'Dream Act'.
2007-09-20 23:07:43 · answer #7 · answered by Kubla Con 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
We like it about as much as the sound of "President of the United States Nikita Kruschev". Keep on enjoying your fantasy for the next 12-13 months if it makes you happy. Let us know how you like the sound of Fred Thompson or Rudy Giuliani taking the oath of office the following January.
2007-09-20 22:58:55 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 9⤊ 1⤋
If that is to be, it will insure a Republican victory in 2012. Even so, i so not wish Mrs. Clinton on America.
2007-09-20 23:47:28 · answer #9 · answered by Truth B. Told ITS THE ECONOMY STUPID 6 · 4⤊ 0⤋
She'll be in prison before she ever gets near the White House again.
2007-09-20 23:48:21 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
It won't happen and anyone who thinks that it should would do us all justice by centering their energies upon voting for best work of fiction, instead of president.
2007-09-20 23:26:32 · answer #11 · answered by wider scope 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋