According to the Daily Mail, A member of the "McCann circle" says that the man Jane Tanner saw carrying a child in a blanket, (oh no she later changed it to carrying a child in pink pyjamas) now, instead of turning towards the beach as she first claimed he turned to walk up the hill towards Robert Murats villa. This is the man that noone else saw despite other people being on the path Tanner claims the man took. Which version if any do you believe?
2007-09-20 22:33:41 · 29 answers · asked by trancebabe 4 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
She is lying and she has been since day one. She didn't see anything, she is more than likely covering for the McCanns. Changing her story all the time should be a huge red flag for the police. Ms. Tanner is not as bright as the McCanns is she? I'm surprised Kate & Gerry haven't told her to just keep her big mouth shut.
2007-09-21 03:44:00 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Did Jane Tanner see a man with a child leave the apartment? Jeremy Wilkins did not see any such movements, nor, seemingly, did he see Ms Tanner. It is still possible that Ms Tanner saw what she alleges. However her September statement, to the effect that she could describe the child’s night attire, is singularly not persuasive. If this description were given in her initial statement/report to the police it might be anticipated that it would have been disclosed at a very early stage so that, in the absence of police records confirming to the contrary, it may be presumed that the night attire detail was not reported. In such circumstances there is a very high degree of probability that Ms. Tanner is not being truthful. If such is the case it must be asked whether she saw what she alleges to have seen or whether she ‘invented/reported’ the story, in the knowledge that a man did move the child’s body from the apartment at approximately 9.15 pm, and in apprehension that others might have seen the event and filed a similar report. If it was considered that others might have seen the movement of the child the report coming from within the circle of friends would exculpate the members of the group and ground the preferred ‘abduction’ story. If indeed the body was moved from the apartment c. 9.15 pm – a very suitable time for doing so as it was virtually dark – it is most significant that two male members of the group (Gerry McCann and Russell O’Brien) were not present at the restaurant at this time.
2007-09-23 13:41:04 · answer #2 · answered by Joscan 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The McCanns don't have their hand up Jane Tanners backside telling her what to say. She's not a puppet.
You are contented to jump on every thing that the press says as long as it suits you.
They say ignorance is bliss
2007-09-21 03:06:39 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
This sad lady just likes being in the media spotlight and has contributed absolutely nothing to the efforts to find Madeleine. Indeed her continual changes of story have done wonders to blur the issue. No wonder conspiracy theories abound!!
2007-09-23 08:38:45 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i dont think any of these are good parents
the mcCann,s leave there children on there own
jane tanner left her sick child on its own
and there other pal,s had a baby alarm
so who are the guilty ones here i ask
2007-09-20 23:05:44 · answer #5 · answered by totty 1 · 3⤊ 0⤋
i don't believe her at all but wonder what her motive is. It certainly doesn't seem to be a desire to help the investigation but does look an attempt to incriminate Murat again. Funny that.
2007-09-21 02:24:46 · answer #6 · answered by Beau Brummell 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Groundhog, I cant believe how many signatures are on that petition, wow thats amazing. 7 people have signed it, quite away to go till they reach the 11,000 target, should only take a couple more years !!
2007-09-21 00:59:47 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
None of it, looks like she is trying to take the pressure off her chummies and sticking it on Robert Murat.
2007-09-20 22:44:40 · answer #8 · answered by sunflowerseed 3 · 6⤊ 0⤋
Either Ms Tanner saw one thing or another, not both. As for changing her story ... Seems to me that she makes a very unreliable witness.
2007-09-20 22:51:40 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 0⤋
Funny I posted this Q and then removed it because you posted same sort of one at same time!
I dont believe any of it - witnesses notorously change versions as time moves on which is why taking early statements is important for accuracy. Whatever version she gave to police first time around is likely to be the most accurate.
I am not sure what the McCann camp thinks they have to gain by printing these stories every day. Why not get back to looking for Maddy????
2007-09-20 22:40:39 · answer #10 · answered by Saucy B 6 · 7⤊ 3⤋