Suppose all leaders of India, Pakistan & bangladesh agreed to make one country out of 3, say akhand Bharat, what should be the power structure? What should be done about Pakistan Army of above 1million. Will Muslims control same numbers of educational institutions, departments, industries, armed forces, stock exchanges & all other things which they're doing in areas not with India or they will be ghastly eliminated as is the case in India since 1947 as repoted by Justice Rajender Sachchar ?
2007-09-20 19:31:21 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
If this is to happen , then one must be prepared to accept that the name could be "akhand pakisthan" or "akhand bangladesh " and not only akhand bharat , if it hapens we have to respect the equality of pakis or bangladeshi too . what makes us think they will accept our denomination and accept name as "akand bharat " think abt it .
secondly also why dont you think what will happen to indian army of 1.5 million why worry abt only pakisthan .
if this happens on democratic grounds than please accept that there will be (and should be ) no indians or pakisthanis etc similarly peoples controlling the institutions will not be muslims or hindus they should be citizens of a nation irrespective of their religion.
if this dosent happen and we still remain hindus and muslims when that time comes , you should be prepared to live in worst anarchy worst than 1947 .
2007-09-20 20:14:44 · answer #1 · answered by p.amol 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Let me tell you, the report of Justice Rajinder Sacchar is factually incorrcct and made only to placate the Congress to facilitate them to push on with their minority appeasment agenda.
The leaders of the three countries will never agree with your proposal . What to kalk of agree they will not even sit togethar on this agenda point. Our Congress leaders will be the most vocal opponents to this.
So forget it and think of something more positive and practical.
2007-09-21 08:16:52 · answer #2 · answered by brij_26pal 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Why to worry 'bout hypothetical situations when there are other pressing matters @ hand...moreover why should India take the burden of these failed or failing states...India has enough things to worry about in its own backward (most the courtesy of these 'thorn-in-the-flesh' neighbors) rather than go about adding to its cup of woes by forming a federation with these basket-cases.
Thanks! n no thanks...India is just fine by itself!
2007-09-21 13:04:58 · answer #3 · answered by Sh00nya 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
AKHAND BHART IS INDIA+PAKISTAN+BANGLADESH+NEPAL +AFGISTAN+BHUTAN
2007-09-23 02:47:20 · answer #4 · answered by RAMAN IOBIAN 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
they can better tell
2007-09-21 02:36:22 · answer #5 · answered by Rana 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋