English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-09-20 16:45:48 · 17 answers · asked by Kelly B 4 in Politics & Government Politics

17 answers

i can understnad voting for bush the first time around (although one could argue we didnt actually elect him)...

but the people who voted for him a second time.... wow.

Sounds like some people were too busy thumping their bibles to notice what a fool bush is.

2007-09-20 16:55:35 · answer #1 · answered by oneakmusic 2 · 3 4

The Dem gained my state through super margins in the two years, besides - yet another vote - even thier prevailing a hundred% of the CA vote - nevertheless would not have replaced something. as properly, i've got not voted for a important occasion presidential candidate via fact the entire Bush-Clinton dynasty component began in '88.

2016-10-19 06:52:29 · answer #2 · answered by rud 4 · 0 0

Actually I voted for Clinton in round one. I was highly disappointed Bush was elected.

After 9/11 I voted for Bush and have no regrets.

2007-09-20 16:55:09 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 4

Well, I'm disappointed that Bush turned out not to be the fiscal conservative I hoped for but given the alternatives, it was a slam dunk.
Gore and Kerry together don't amount to enough brain cells to rub together.

2007-09-20 16:54:12 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4 2

Yes and no. Yes he sucks, but the alternative was definately no better and things could have and probably would have turned out a whole lot worse.

2007-09-20 16:59:45 · answer #5 · answered by Sloan R 5 · 0 0

Not nearly as much as the democrats who voted in this lame congress.

2007-09-20 17:07:27 · answer #6 · answered by LeAnne 7 · 0 0

No. He is not Ronald Reagan, and I disagree with No Child Left Behind and many parts of the Patriot Act, but takes way too much slack. He is much better than John Kerry would have been.

2007-09-20 16:52:31 · answer #7 · answered by rexarobinson 1 · 6 2

Uh, no. He has done what he said he would do in 2004, much unlike our congress. They are getting worse ratings than he is. Ha!

2007-09-20 17:50:32 · answer #8 · answered by The Angry Elephant 4 · 0 0

Nooooooo ! b/c like bush i ll never accept the fact that i m an idiot.

2007-09-20 16:56:08 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

Not a bit. He was the best choice then, and he's still the best choice. If not for term limits I'd vote for him again.

2007-09-20 16:56:46 · answer #10 · answered by ? 5 · 3 2

fedest.com, questions and answers