I am involved in this trade:
Marc Bulger
Reggie Bush
Larry Fitzgerald
for
Drew Brees
Larry Johnson
Santana Moss
Who is getting the better end of it? (non PPR league)
2007-09-20 16:43:54 · 5 answers · asked by jerchpd 2 in Sports ➔ Fantasy Sports
if you are trading bulger bush and fitzgerald i say go for it. the saints are starting off rocky but i still think that he has a better chance to put up big numbers over bulger. id say moss and fitzy are just about equal but johnson is still a top 3 back in this league. hes starting slow but by the time week 5-6 comes around he will be back to where he was last year. bush is still splitting with deuce. id say go for it. brees LJ and moss is a pretty good deal.
2007-09-20 17:15:27 · answer #1 · answered by jay D 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Brees, Johnson, and Moss is the better end. Reggie Bush has been very inconsistant. Bulger as well. And Larry Fitzgerald is in a Ken Wisenhunt run first offense so he is not getting as mant looks. Brees should bounce back, all of KC's points will be scored by Johnson, and Santana Moss is a very consistant fantasy #1 Receiver.
2007-09-20 17:25:27 · answer #2 · answered by horse 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Brees, Johnson, and Moss is the better team. Brees has not got started offensively yet, but he will catch fire, especially against a weak NFC South this season. Larry Johnson is a beast, and Kansas City is getting ready to start giving him 30 carries a game with their QB situation a mess. Santana Moss is a nice WR who should score you 6-8 TDs this season.
2007-09-20 18:06:47 · answer #3 · answered by Donnie B 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Winners-Phillies for paying for Oswalt in basic terms whilst they mandatory to make a pass. The Phils have been rolling as of previous due and this addition ought to declare them favorites to win the NL East. The Rangers did their area with the aid of including Cliff Lee and Jorge Cantu. Yankees crammed their hollow at DH with the aid of including Berkman and Kearns who can hit off the bench. Losers-Mets are the biggest losers for not being energetic suited whilst they locate themselves in a bad hunch. looking back, the Mets ought to have extra yet another arm to the rotation. D-Backs are losers for giving up their catcher. particular they have had a bad season yet Snyder has constantly carried out a solid activity coping with the D-Backs youthful team and he's likewise between the few catchers in baseball it quite is extra effective than an subject-loose hitter.
2016-11-06 00:23:10 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
id stick with what you got
2007-09-20 17:12:07 · answer #5 · answered by erik 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋