hahaha, it would have been easier if wife have grabbed husband and say "massage"! =)
2007-09-21 20:36:04
·
answer #1
·
answered by battgirl 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
I don’t need go-betweens because I think I can get my message across without difficulty. In most instances, my messages are clear, self-explanatory and don’t require further analysis, and the recipient should have no problem understanding them. Unless I intentionally want them to be ambiguous, and I want the other person to make his or her own interpretation.
The problem with go-betweens is the possible loss of the message’s meaning in the exchange, as in your story (which was very funny btw).
2007-09-23 06:36:53
·
answer #2
·
answered by sweetwater 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
LOL!
No, because go-betweens often cause a distortion in the communication process...worse, a communication breakdown.
2007-09-22 01:47:00
·
answer #3
·
answered by shirley g 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
I don't have ajoke, and I don't have an answer. Just wanted to star it because it really amused me no end.
2007-09-20 21:52:30
·
answer #4
·
answered by boyplakwatsa.com 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
tell her, ma sackit ang ulo ako.
2007-09-20 18:37:01
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Hahahahaha, funny.
2007-09-21 00:57:26
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
kaya nga
"KAY SUSAN TAYO" magsabi, hindi sa utal na bata!
(mabuti nalang may sulat dito, kundi nasampal mo ako, utal din ako, eh)
2007-09-20 17:38:03
·
answer #7
·
answered by 36 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
i almost forgot the tagalog term for that. i have to read it twice.
nice one, aqua girl.
2007-09-20 17:47:31
·
answer #8
·
answered by MAGpie 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
bisdak pud di-ay ka kuya jobong. parehas di-ay ta ni kuya alan.
ate inday - ok pud your joke.
2007-09-23 15:13:52
·
answer #9
·
answered by PG_13 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
LOL!!! that's a nice one... but think I read that already in a text message from a friend in the Philippines... thanks, though...
2007-09-20 16:22:53
·
answer #10
·
answered by Juan C 6
·
1⤊
0⤋