This is hypothetical.
2007-09-20 12:58:24 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Nope... we are going to be an occupying force until the oil runs dry. Then we'll leave.
2007-09-21 02:54:23 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I doubt the Iraqi leadership would ask them to leave.
I don't know but it would seem that they wouldn't really have a choice. They may insist on a militiary base there because that's what the U.S. does.
Who asked them to leave? Was it the Iraqi government or another group? I think the other groups want us out but I'm not sure about the Iraqi government.
2007-09-21 01:49:25 · answer #2 · answered by Unsub29 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What has he lied approximately? And what do you think approximately a political answer? it particularly is fairly common to spout all this rhetoric. "Bush lied & human beings died." it particularly is the dumbest rhyme on account that "If the glove do not in fantastic condition, you should acquit." Gee, each and every president in each and every conflict has stated something perceived as untrue and as inflicting the deaths of yankee infantrymen. And the stuff approximately Bush being a cheerleader and prosperous and spoiled isn't basically one million/2 fact, yet so beat to dying it fairly is uninteresting. i think of the infantrymen returning are much extra in touch with certainty than somebody who hasn't been there, and those I surely have talked to are completely at the back of our president and this conflict. Oh and as for Vietnam area 2 - my husband and brother have been there. The conflict replaced into surely being gained, yet Nixon paid interest to "generally happening" opinion and pulled our troops out. i desire that Bush and whoever suceeeds him, Democrat or Republican won't pay attention to the so-talked approximately as "generally happening" evaluations, and could see this through to the superb conceivable effect for the folk of Iraq and the folk of the u . s ..
2016-10-19 06:21:08 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The US Military might but the President would not allow that.
Its going to take a lot of time to redeploy them so we will be there a while yet. The Military heads would have reasons why we shouldn't and would stay until they and the commander said to go.
2007-09-20 13:05:36 · answer #4 · answered by carrieM 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No. Bush intends to occupy Iraq indefinitely, perhaps forever.
If Bush isn't president, then perhaps we would leave, but certainly taking our time about it and certainly cutting a deal for bases, etc.
2007-09-20 13:12:01 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
They asked us to leave LAST YEAR.
bush ignored them.
Violence increased drastically.
To anyone not paying attention:
THE IRAQ WAR IS ONGOING BECAUSE WE ARE THERE.
2007-09-21 01:39:53 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No. Because Bush would always take it as nothing serious and keep our troops bogged down in Iraq.
"It wasn't an official declaration to leave."--GWB
2007-09-20 13:04:02 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
No.
remember, they have already said we could leave. They have everything under control
2007-09-20 13:04:02 · answer #8 · answered by midnight&moonlight'smom 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
We have been asked to leave.
We refused to do so.
It's not a hypothetical.
2007-09-20 13:03:57 · answer #9 · answered by coragryph 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
They won't ask and the US military won't leave. One hand washes the other.
2007-09-20 13:04:02 · answer #10 · answered by Page 4 · 1⤊ 3⤋