Black boys (BB) go to a party that they were invited to but were denied entry when they got there by a group of whites. The whites beat up the blacks using fists and beer bottles. Only 1 white man charged, and that was a misdemeanor battery charge. The white man served no time, paid no penalty & was given probation. No hate crime was filed although he said the party was for whites only. I personally believe the charges fit the crime. 2 days later one of the white boys racially mocks of one of the BBs who got beat up at the party. White boy then gets punched in face. There’s conflicted testimony re: if white boy lost consciousness. He was hit multiple times. Fight occurs at school so white boy goes to hosp. & is released within 2 hours with no damage except for a swollen eye and a few bruises. BBs are charged with a Felony assault bec. "a tennis shoe was a deadly weapon". BBs have huge bond, go to jail. These charges don't fit.
Tennis shoe vs beer bottle, which is deadlier?
2007-09-20
10:44:37
·
6 answers
·
asked by
halestrm
6
in
Politics & Government
➔ Law & Ethics
Sorry this was rough to read, had to edit down to 1000 characters.
The vast difference in the charges is why I believe racism is involved.
2007-09-20
10:45:38 ·
update #1
I do not believe the first group should have been charged with a hate crime, same with the second group. I do believe the first group meant it when they said "whites only are allowed" prior to beating up the black boys.
Coragryph. I mostly agree, but remember, they were invited, and the group keeping them out were not the owners of the property, they were guests.
2007-09-20
11:21:07 ·
update #2