2007-09-20
08:19:54
·
7 answers
·
asked by
wanda3s48
7
in
Entertainment & Music
➔ Polls & Surveys
I ask because someone recently posted a question here--"Who is the worst serial killer ever/in history/(something like that)? The best answer selected was "hitler" & I thought that was odd.
2007-09-20
08:34:13 ·
update #1
I know the difference, but obviously not everyone does.
2007-09-21
01:32:53 ·
update #2
Thanks to all who answered
2007-09-21
01:35:11 ·
update #3
A serial killer is someone who murders three or more people in three or more separate events over a period of time, with a cooling-off period between murders. they are also specifically motivated by a variety of psychological urges, primarily power and sexual compulsion, NOT anything material. His victims are very carefully selected, the serial killer will not stray from his preferred type.
A mass murderer is a person who kills a large number of people typically at the same time or over a short time span (also known as spree killings). also his victims are random, he does not care who they are. a mass murderer's aim is to kill as many people as possible, whoever they are.
The basic difference is that a serial killer will kill one victim at a time and his spree will last the whole of his life, until he is caught or killed, whilst a mass murder will wake up one morning and gun down 30 people in the same day. columbine shootings were mass murder. Ted Bundy was a serial killer.
I hope this made it very clear. Take care.
PS: Hitler was a dictator, i think mass murder is too weak of a word to describe what he did. What he did was genocide.
2007-09-20 17:01:39
·
answer #1
·
answered by Sasha 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yeah that was a wrong answer. A mass murderer is all about the multi-tasking, and getting the job done in the quickest and most efficient manner possible. A serial killer can only do one job at a time. Basically, serial killers suck at killing, but overall get much more experience with the process.
2007-09-20 15:50:25
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
A mass murderer kills, usually with little regard to who is being killed, and does it on a more massive scale. Hitler would be a mass murderer. A serial killer is a criminal, usually with a specific type of victim in mind (Dennis Radar, Henry Lee Lucas).
2007-09-20 15:27:13
·
answer #3
·
answered by Mickey Mouse Spears 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
a serial killer usually has one victim at a time, doing the same thing to each one as he goes....& a mass murderer kills many at once in different ways.
2007-09-20 15:27:40
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
A serial killer kills in different locations, mass murderers kill in the same loction in a short amount of time.
2007-09-20 15:27:34
·
answer #5
·
answered by lifescircle 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
serial killers kill one at a time, mass murderers pick off several at once from the bell tower?
Honestly, I don't know
2007-09-20 15:26:44
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
they are both scary people to come in contact with....but I think serial is like the stalker who chooses victims and mass would be something like hitler...i think......=]
2007-09-20 15:28:23
·
answer #7
·
answered by #25 4
·
0⤊
0⤋