the first one. sorry for your loss...
2007-09-20 08:05:28
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Definitely, Whom
2007-09-20 08:04:45
·
answer #2
·
answered by The Y!ABut 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
a million- The season is over, they're nevertheless around yet with the season over and a slowdown in questions, why come right here so generally. soccer is in finished swing, so is basketball and hockey. 2- see above, seasons over, wait till iciness conferences, spring preparation... 3- thumbs down is okay in the event that they answer is incorrect or you in basic terms do no longer probable like an answer. decrease to and fro comments ok, yet ***** sessions must be stored to a minimum. 4 - see a million and a couple of. Seasons over... 5- see a million, 2 and four... ... shouldn't thumbs up or down each and every question, merely those which you already know are incorrect or extremely think of suck ... "baseball suck" human beings SUCK ... and A-Rod nicely he has eating some humble pie, an extremely high priced humble pie i could choose to consume! It extremely must be Scott Boras sucks!
2016-11-05 23:26:00
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The sentence is redundant. Obviously, if the cat was your beloved cat, you adored the cat.
2007-09-20 08:06:54
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Technically, you should use THAT. A cat is not a person. You only use who/whom when refering to people.
2007-09-20 08:05:29
·
answer #5
·
answered by catsmeowjrk2000 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Whom...object of the sentence
2007-09-20 08:04:23
·
answer #6
·
answered by Bill 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
"Whom." Even though who and whom are used for people, cats are mammals, so it should be okay.
2007-09-20 08:06:07
·
answer #7
·
answered by princess 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Whom.
2007-09-20 08:57:09
·
answer #8
·
answered by chappydog26 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
whom...although who and whom are usually reserved for people
2007-09-20 09:00:35
·
answer #9
·
answered by nonnie 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
A CAT IS NOT A PERSON I WOULD USE WHICH WE ADORED.
2007-09-20 08:05:15
·
answer #10
·
answered by Loren S 7
·
1⤊
0⤋