Lefties/commies/socialists, does it make sense for "neocons" to incite revolution in Pakistan?

Question

Of course it doesn't. But i'd like to hear your insane rantings of CIA and boogeyman shananigans.

What good would it do to have a nuclear power run by religious whackos? Draw the world into a nuclear war? that accomplishes what? Big oil can't make money if half the world is destroyed in nuclear war.

Yeah it's like Bin Laden is dead and being used a puppet, but not the "neocons", rather the islamo fascists.

Try to use reason and logic in your answer and not merely attacks or personal insults as you are prone to do. Also try to answer the question which you rarely if ever do!!!

thank you.

Answer 1

Savage Nation huh?

Based on your name, I can understand why this question is more of a rant than a question. It can barely be read considering your lack of grammatical and punctuation skills.

I can't even tell which side you're on. I think I'd rather hear another one of the real Savage's enthralling stories about all the child molesters he's hung out with through-out his life.

Answer 2

Islamofascist is a term used to demonize some idealogs someone doesn't like or doesn't care to start liking. Call them what they are. Don't use obscure made up terms.

The right has been trying to frame the debate on issues with words like communist, socialist and islamofascist for several years. Fortunately people are realizing how ridiculous it is. The credibility, what there was of it, of the conservative movement in America has been tarnished at best and has disappeard althoghether in many people's minds.

Bin Laden is no puppet nor is he a puppet master. He is an evil mastermind that has made trouble for people all over the world. Instead of diddling around in Iraq we should have used all our might and money to take him down along with Al Qaeda and other terrorist groups.

Personal attacks, name calling and refusal to discuss real issues is the modus operandus of the far right in the US. The neocons have benefitted from those radicals but that is about to stop. The election of 2006 was an omen of things to come.

No more boogy man or islamofascist terrorists under every rock in America. No more fear tactics to further a lame agenda aimed at totalitarian type control in the name of patriotism. No more of a president who calls the document he swore to uphold and defend, a goddamn piece of paper.

We have religious wackos running things in our government and Iran has religious wackos running theres. This seems like a recipe for disaster.

Answer 3

Bin Laden is not the first or last Islamist to declare jihad against General Musharraf for supporting US bases. Musharraf is being supported by the US because he has spoken out against terrorism.

However, it should be noted that Musharraf is not entirely our stooge. He specifically negotiated with the US (despite some very angry and inappropriate phone calls to his government) to minimize the impact US forces would have on his country. Repeatedly he has made movements to give amnesty to Taliban fighters and some Al Qaeda terrorists.

The fact is that Musharraf is getting US funding when he is a dictator. He got power in a military coup, has banned opposition figures, changed the constitution to give himself unending power, broken promises to stop being army chief and president, and has used his power to dismiss his Chief Justice when they disagree. There is no check on Musharraf's power, therefore there is no democracy. We are not supporting a democratic Pakistan but a military dictatorship. Why didn't we learn our lesson when we did the same thing for Saddam?

Answer 4

what is your question ??

please try to use reason and logic in your question if you want the same in an answer !!

-------------------------------------

I would be more than happy to give a real answer to a real question !

let me help you with that - keep your question honest and straight forward.
don't add rude insults or dumb rants.

also don't bother to ask a Loaded question like -
"what good would it do to have a nuclear power run by religious whackos?"
because the obvious answer is "No Good would come of that !"

are you just looking for excuses as to why bush gave up on the war on terror ( war against Al Qaeda ) when it went into Pakistan and gave us the old bait and switch with Iraq ?

Answer 5

Funny you should ask that when just LAST MONTH the news was the DEMOCRAT Presidential candidates in their debates were the ones insisting we should invade Pakistan to "get Bin Laden".
It was the REPUBLICANS insisting that action would be INSANE!
I LOVE how you Leftist PINKOS try to push YOUR insanity off on Conservatives.
It is your TYPICAL methodology of lying and distorting the facts. You say or do something distasteful and then later claim it was the Republicans that did it.
Us Conservatives expect nothing less from the likes of YOU!

Answer 6

Some yahoo liberals seem to believe having a guy like Hamid Gul in control of Pakistan's nukes is a good thing.

Absolutely no idea of the danger they court with their left-wing blathering

Answer 7

you bet ye it does.