In 1984 there 18 cases of violence, death threats and/or harassment from so-called "pro-life" groups in from of reproductive clinics, namely Planned Parenthood.
20 years later in 2004, that organization reported that a third of ALL clinics have experienced this, including arson and the need for bulletproof vests.
From a self-proclaimed "pro-life" movement. NOW can you see why these glaring right wing hypocrites are called not just intrusionists, but "terrorists".
The end justifies the means to serve their God.
So why cant pro-life Republicans talk about this in their party?
Fear of being called a "babykilling liberal" by "moral" people?
Most have told they the feel intimidated and shut out by the friong element that has hijacked the GOP.
2007-09-20 05:50:21 · 9 answers · asked by Jim W 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Wasnt talking about animal rights crap and never said they wernt any better but
ANSWER THE QUESTION!
2007-09-20 06:15:06 · update #1
over 900,000 kids in foster care waiting for adoption . if 'pro life ' people cared so much , that number would be 0 . 'pro life ' is a scam by rich people to keep minorities down .
2007-09-20 06:06:11 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 3⤋
You haven't been listening, have you!
I've been here since last September (way more than I should have been, based on the constant slamming from people like you, LOL).
But in that time period, I have constistently pointed out that the US has laws against terrorism, and that as a Christian, I uphold the laws of our land.
So, pay attention, because abortion activists have the ABSOLUTE right to march for their cause, while the right of ILLEGAL aliens and separatist Muslims MIGHT not be inviolate.
2007-09-20 07:56:15 · answer #2 · answered by ? 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Preaching to the choir in this case, Jim - and I *never* agree with you. No one has justification for terrorizing people - no one. I don't care *what* your ideology is. If you have a problem with the laws, deal with the government.
Extremists on both sides are ruining my country and it really pisses me off. We need to start prosecuting these freaks like the terrorists they are.
Trust me - animal rights activists are no better. I insisted a local, law-abiding trapper call the FBI and turn one group in...they *were* investigated and now leave this particular man alone. But I doubt very seriously they've changed their ways - they've just moved on to another victim.
I answered the damned question!! What are you looking for? Should I be throwing myself in front of those freaks? Going on a hunger strike? Acting as stupid as they do and threaten them? Bite me. I've had a close call at a PP clinic once - took my friend in for a pregnancy test, and the place was firebombed less than 5 minutes after we left. A very dear friend of mine works for PP locally - she has to be escorted to her car by the police quite often. I think that is utter BS and disgraceful. But I can't speak for the Republican party, Jim. I can only speak for myself. Of course, you'll just report me anyway - every single time I answer one of your "questions", I get reported. Coincidence? I doubt it.
Dave, I agree with you to a point - but our foster care system is *not* set up to place children in permanent homes. If the kids get adopted, the states lose federal money - that's why it's so difficult to adopt a child in this country. Why do you think so many people adopt from foreign countries? Because it's easier and cheaper. A lot of good people don't have tens of thousands of dollars for legal fees that they'd need to adopt a child.
2007-09-20 05:57:21 · answer #3 · answered by Jadis 6 · 2⤊ 3⤋
No. professional-existence is a correct term. professional-decision sounds extra perfect than professional-abortion b/c whilst that decision is made a guy or woman dies. you choose decision? IUDs, diaphragms, condoms, vasectomy, tubal ligation, hormone patches, etc. All those are selections. whilst human beings decide for to no longer make the main of them, then they're identifying directly to probably create slightly one. the infant shouldn't ought to pay for their stupidity with its existence. bypass forward w/ the thumbs down. IDGAF
2016-10-19 05:19:16 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am not a Democrat or Republican. I am not a Christian. I am Wiccan. I am not a terrorist for opposing that which destroys innocent life. You are talking about a group of people that is a very small representation of pro-lifers. Don't judge us all that way, please.
2007-09-20 07:12:43 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I one who is consistently PRO LIFE, I find bombing abortion clinics disgusting!!
The rationale that you kill the Doctor, or destroy the clinic to save a baby is preposterous!!
2007-09-20 06:00:27 · answer #6 · answered by Supercell 5 · 5⤊ 0⤋
The violence is wrong . Although I doubt many recent attacks .
2007-09-20 08:53:25 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Even a broken clock is right twice a day Jim and this is one of those two times for you.
Now, can we talk about PETA blowing up science labs?
Using your logic, theyre just average everyday liberals, right?
2007-09-20 06:00:51 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
Pro-choice=pro-I dont care what happens to fetus' as long as it wasnt me
2007-09-20 05:59:32 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 5⤋