2007-09-20 02:36:24 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
he should go for the same length of time as anyone else who commits the same kind of crime
2007-09-21 00:51:36 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
This thing has been a mess ever since he got by with murder a long time ago. My belief in justice was "shot" back then. I'm numb to how stupid & gullable people are when it comes to that creature. If it's treated lightly AGAIN, I don't know what the reaction of the people to put up with it all over again will be.
2007-09-20 09:57:27 · answer #2 · answered by rat racer 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Based on this case or his previous case?
Honestly with this case - - he stole back personal property that was stolen from him. Now come on, if somebody took something from you and you took it back wouldn't you feel justified? It was only a citizen’s arrest! LOL :) Although he should have called the police and handled the situation appropriately...
Now if its a case of receiving stolen property and the person he "hemmed" up was not the person who stole from him, and had no knowledge that they had received stolen property - - then that's different.
But it seems like with this case the real criminal is being protected because of who we are dealing with. I see it like this: "You robbed me, but I’m going to jail for robbing you back?" "No you’re going to jail because you got away with murder the first time and your going to pay for it now!"
The truth is he's already poked fun of getting away with murder in his book, so is it really a fair case for justice? His previous case has already found him guilty in the eyes of the public for this case. He's stupid to even be caught in this situation already knowing that people wish death upon you from your past!
Celebrities think they are above the law anyways but add in color dynamics and it’s a whole another issue we won't even get into. He's a MURDER and a disappointment to our entire race - - if he goes down for something he doesn't deserve, "GOOD" it won't be the first time our justice system has failed us...
2007-09-20 10:07:34 · answer #3 · answered by mentalchallenge 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes! The funny thing is that he is out of $$$ and now has to have a court appointed lawyer this time. He spent all his $$ to hire out the best of attorneys the previous time.
2007-09-20 09:50:06 · answer #4 · answered by Ink Corporate 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think about 15-20 years would be a nice little stretch for him.
People still say he is "innocent" before it has even gone to trial.
I guess the moon landing was faked also!
2007-09-20 09:39:11 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
YES!!! For at least 30 years. That man is an idiot and deserves to rot in jail!! Even if it's for stealing he needs to pay for the murders of his ex-wife and her friend.
2007-09-20 09:39:50 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
He should've gone to jail for murdering Nicole Brown & Ron Goldman.
This won't stick either, but it should.
2007-09-20 09:41:54 · answer #7 · answered by jan c 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yep. For the rest of his life. Kidnapping, burglary and robbery, plus one of the men had a heart attack!
2007-09-20 09:40:08 · answer #8 · answered by The Nana of Nana's 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes.
The rest of his life in a prison full of battered women who were unjustly imprisoned for killing their wife beating husbands!
2007-09-20 09:40:29 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Life in prison
2007-09-20 09:43:44 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
no.
OJ for president- then we'd know where he is most of the time. Just a glorified politician- stealing from someone.
2007-09-20 09:42:31 · answer #11 · answered by ditdit 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋