at the end of the day there is still that beautifull little girl missing. instead of bad mouthing take a minute to think about that.
oh by the way the dna in the car was the twins not maddies.
maddie gone but not forgotten
2007-09-20 00:07:12 · 24 answers · asked by shellylou2405 2 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
riff raff i do agree with u, they should never have left the children alone, lets hope other people learn from this.
2007-09-20 02:01:03 · update #1
To be quite honest, I am sick of the sight of this couple. Everybody is now seeing them as persecuted, unfortunate victims. The fact is, whether they were involved in Madeleine's disappearance or not, they left very young children in an unlocked apartment because they wanted to go dining out. I thought family holidays were about families, but it seems this only applies until 8pm for the McCanns. I really can't make my mind up about what I think has happened to the child, but I made my mind up from Day One about what I think of her parents. Please don't fall for the doe-eyed expressions or the idea that, as doctors and pillars of society, their parental responsibilities differ from everyone else's. They left the kids all alone, in what was an unfamiliar environment and never even bothered to lock up. Sorry if this sounds harsh, but those are the grim realities of what they did.
2007-09-20 01:15:51 · answer #1 · answered by Riff Raff 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I agree with you but what you are saying is being said on here every single day so I do think despite the wordings of some questions/answers that although Madeleine is gone she is not forgotten. I'm trying to be non judegemental against the McCann's until things move on further. With regard to the DNA in the car what I read was it could belong to the twins as it was almost the same as Madeleine's. I haven't read anything about the DNA being absolutely definite for any of the McCann children.
2007-09-20 00:35:19 · answer #2 · answered by Ms Mat Urity 6 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Remeber O.J SIMPSON,in the evidence there was a blood in his car,there was blood on his socks erm he had the keys to his murderd ex wifes house(the only set) erm he had left a large glove at the scene.erm what else oh yes his blood was found at the scene,he had brought a knife with the same details as the weapon used and guess what he got away with it. So in Maddies story blood,sweat,hair oh its her sisters or Maddies belongings that was just thrown in the boot like nothing since she had been missing.Your all fools that believe they did not do it ,what i am trying to say is that they lawyers representing o.j came up with that many good reasons why all theses clues was left behind it was amazing how they could explain it all and got him of with it.
Yet after he was re trialed and got found guilty, so its the same as this case these do gooders that are explaining away this and that to get the Mc Canns of. Keep my words in mind MADDIE WILL NOT BE SEEN AGAIN,because it has been too long now,loads of money is up for someone who knowa,i believe friendship means nothing when money comes into it ,i believe if someone knew they would have said.I wish they would find that pretty little girl,she looks so adorible , but its been too long and maybe a friend helped them while the world was watching the Mc Canns.
2007-09-20 01:05:59 · answer #3 · answered by sexy hotrod 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
and where did you read that the dna is from the twins? you people knock and discredit the newspapers when there is an article against the mccann's but when it's for them you're all reporting it on here....a bit bias don't you think?.
yes, i agree there is a little child missing but have you stop and asked yourself why she is missing in the first place?.
2007-09-20 02:25:04 · answer #4 · answered by daisy 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The dna according to some papers is the twins and others say it is maddies dna from sweat on her sandals. So what ever you believe depends entirely on what papers you read and has nothing to do with real evidence as no one whether anti or pro mccann can state for a fact 100% what evidence they have or whose dna they have. They can only state what they have read in their paper that day.
2007-09-20 00:20:09 · answer #5 · answered by Charley 4 · 8⤊ 1⤋
I'm neither for, nor am I against.
Other than poor Maddie, it's the twins I feel for.
How the hell are they going to explain this to them when they are old enough to understand?
2007-09-20 02:06:12 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I totally agree, a little girl in a big wide world with someone she doesn't know - i'd hate to be in that situation.
some people are just really selfish when they start bad mouthing the McCanns, i say we should support them until it is 100% true that they have something to do with it - although, in my opinion, that will NEVER happen, they ARE innocent and always will be!
m
2007-09-20 00:48:32 · answer #7 · answered by MegSTAR 3 · 3⤊ 2⤋
If everyone throughout the world keeps looking hopefully we might find Maddie - especially with the eyes being they way they are she will be found. The news papers said the DNA was the twins - I don't believe that either.
2007-09-20 00:21:11 · answer #8 · answered by Jackie M 7 · 6⤊ 3⤋
wheres the proof about the dna
2007-09-20 01:18:42 · answer #9 · answered by bluebellsx2 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the world has cried for that little girl and wished more than anything for her to be returned, i dont think anyone else knows where she is because reward money would be too tempting, when doctors in every day life make mistakes they cover each other up, that is a well known fact
2007-09-20 00:43:35 · answer #10 · answered by ROBERTA L 1 · 3⤊ 3⤋