Pls give me a good answer
2007-09-19 23:20:01 · 20 answers · asked by jayesbean 2 in Sports ➔ Football ➔ English Football
yup
bcz of money
no money no talk
thats all
2007-09-20 06:55:38 · answer #1 · answered by zahrin_surie 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Abramovich wanted to win the champions league by playing nice looking football.
I think its quite obvious Abramovich isnt a real football fan, firstly you cant always play god football, you hav eto grind out results, the year Liverpool won the champions league we played diabolically in some parts of games but had the drive to come back and win, classic example the chelsea game, we were both awlful.
I think also its hard for Abramovich cos since he's owned chelsea and had mourinho in charge 3 out of the 4 seasons a Englsih club has got to the final of the champions league.
I think getting rid of Mourinho is a stupid idea for Chelsea but as a Liverpool fan im pretty happy, also I wouldnt be surpised if abramovich was out soon, unless he gets someone who wins everything, which he wont, I dont see him hanging aroudn
2007-09-20 07:35:45 · answer #2 · answered by hopper13 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, I am very sure that Mourinho left because of Abromovich who is executing autocratic powers as owner/manager. He is a generalised owner/manager who is controlling the entire running of the club. As an advice , the owner/manager should allow the coach does his work else history will repeat itself.
Austin.
2007-09-20 08:34:39 · answer #3 · answered by Austin 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes. Abromovich should have left the coaching to the manager and let the manager decide which players to bring into Chelsea.
2007-09-20 06:40:25 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
it all started when abromovich bought shevenco above mourihiho's head. he didn't like this and i can't blame him, you bring a manager in to make player decisions. How did chelsea get a new manager so quickly? abromovich knew he was going to let him go for a while i reckon.
2007-09-20 07:32:59 · answer #5 · answered by manc.lass 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes because Abramovic paid £30 million to bring his friend Shevchenko to the Bridge (ludicrous). Mourinho was never comfortable with that and didn't play him much (rightly so). The end came and Jose can walk into any job in world football while that crook Abramovic can whistle for it (as far as I'm concerned and I'm not even a Chelsea fan).
2007-09-20 06:37:07 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
Most definitely. There is no other possible explanation for this shocking turn of events. He has clearly stated in the past that there are only two ways in which he would leave Chelsea - either at the end of his contract in 2010, or get sacked.
2007-09-20 08:13:17 · answer #7 · answered by nishjain7 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The rumour is that before abramovich bought chelsea, he watched man utd play real madrid play an epic match, full of amazing football and wanted to buy a team to watch like that every week.
unfortunately he picked chelsea and a boring (although efficient) manager and once it wasn't working out he's kicked him out.
2007-09-20 08:15:10 · answer #8 · answered by Chopper 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, Mourinho left Chelsea because he was being given everything to get the job done but could'nt.
His arrogance put him at loggerheads with Bram so the situation was impossible for both parties.
The big man has the final word. Good job too.
CFC fan.
2007-09-20 06:30:19 · answer #9 · answered by mlud12000 4 · 0⤊ 3⤋
After Felipao hit that Serbian player. The UEFA is going to punish him. So Portuguese football association will sack him.
And Mourinho will take his seat.
2007-09-20 06:36:46 · answer #10 · answered by Sulto 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
He didn't want to leave
he got the sack because he cant keep the same few players for a season or two
so without £30m to spend each season
HE IS USELESS!
2007-09-20 08:06:06 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋