With all due respects to both the legends, i was wondering how wld Sunil Gavaskar and Geffreory Boycott fared in 20 & 20 cricket format ?
2007-09-19 22:31:24 · 11 answers · asked by reena v 2 in Sports ➔ Cricket
they are better off in the comm entry box
2007-09-20 15:56:19 · answer #1 · answered by rkrish79 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO, Gavaskar Boycout the 20& 20criket
2007-09-21 00:28:37 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Gavaskar is the best-ever maximum appropriate attempt adventure batsman of India. Kapil Dev's is the main suitable contribution to Indian cricket. Gavaskar's time grow to be low in batsmanship yet Gavaskar does no longer throw away his wicket. He might safeguard his team to the final ball. Hw favourite a draw in comparison to a loss to his team. Kapil Dev grow to be a complicated working guy or woman on the sector. He might bat, bowl, field and urge one and all else to play complicated. yet then, he might play for a win and interior the approach some cases loses his wicket. the two at the same time had the main suitable impact on Indian cricket. each of them performed under the different's captaincy. 2 super personalities. Kapil Dev commanded extra know than Gavaskar in playing days because of the fact of his urge to win is extra beneficial than the urge to no longer lose. This grow to be a assessment between those 2 gamers. under Kapil's captaincy, India won the international Cup. After retirement, Gavaskar's occupation has been extra perfect than that of Kapil because of the fact on a similar time as one towed the BCCI line and benefitted, the different antagonistic BCCI and suffered the outcomes. BCCI is made up of nasty blokes, you recognize.
2016-10-19 04:37:54 · answer #3 · answered by reardigan 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Being openers they would have opened the innings say for a world 11
Gavaskar is determined to carry his bat through scores like 20 off 70 balls only to be run out by boycott who was as determined to carry his bat through
His stats marginally better at say 30 off 50 balls
2007-09-20 01:56:45 · answer #4 · answered by maaverick 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well! Good idea. In opposite sides will be good enough. I think 50runs on the board will be a challenging score to chase.
2007-09-20 03:27:22 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Both of them are not suited in the T20 format. However, if they are played, they can seal one end, keep the strike rotating and give maximum balls to other batsman to play..
2007-09-20 00:22:58 · answer #6 · answered by vakayil k 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Thats life some people just can't handle change.
Even if its good for the sport.
So sad.
2007-09-19 22:48:49 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well they could have played as Bowlers and batted at Number 11 .(Or may be as 12th Man ) .
LOL !!!
2007-09-19 22:53:45 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
they were good defenders not hitters and strikers
2007-09-20 18:14:52 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
ha ha~... plz .....you gonna kill me...
ha ha........ may be 50 ball 20 runs each.... ha ha ha~
2007-09-20 15:31:41 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋