Simple answer.
No.
2007-09-19 19:10:21
·
answer #1
·
answered by Think 1st 7
·
6⤊
0⤋
Since when do we have to let a Black person who commited a crime get off the hook because he is Black.
Are you saying everyone who is Black can commit all the crimes they want and get off scott free?
I am White myself and I can tell you right now, I have come across Whites who felt OJ was Innocent and Blacks who felt he was Guilty.
And i've come across people in both races who had mixed feelings on the issue.
OJ Simpson was found innocent in the criminal case by all 12 Jurors but some of them (including a Black Juror) later said we should have found him Guilty.
A dismissed juror who was Black wrote a book saying he felt OJ was guilty (which was published before the verdict, it made me suspect a hung jury would occur).
I had assumed he was innocent till the wrongful death suit where he denied having hit Nicole (and there are numerous 911 calls from her from 1985 - 1993, why do ya think she made those calls?)
And that turned me to undecided, although I use to think he was not the direct killer per say but that the deaths were a mob hit and either the mob did it to frame OJ due to failure to pay for drugs, or OJ paid the mob to do it (which would have made him guilty as if the knife was in his hand).
But with this latest robbery, well guess what, there is high evidence he was involved in a crime.
2007-09-19 19:28:19
·
answer #2
·
answered by MrCool1978 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, the OJ case doesn't prove that people in America are racist. People have their own thoughts on who is guilty in any cases, but the bias is normally based off other ideas. You can tell that a great deal of this country is racist, however, through plenty of other actions. I've seen many people argue about Obama's race, as though it's a deciding factor in electing him. Racism happens on a day to day basis, though, so it's not necessary to represent it on a national level.
2007-09-19 19:24:36
·
answer #3
·
answered by whiteflame55 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Heck theres someblack people that willside with blacks through anything.
NAACP started defending VICK.
With the evidence against Oj the way it was, he got off on technicallities, because his high priced lawyers were able to circumvent the law.
WHY did he lose the civil case?
If someones guilty I call it as such. If someones innocent Ill add my petition.
But O.J. was guilty, and is Now Guilty.
AndI hope he goes to jail for a long long time.
Finally all his deciet caught up with him.
And hes going to pay.
Even if they dismiss the tape recording...One witness will testify against him....
who dosnt have a record.
And O.J. will definitely get a few years in Jail.!!!
Payback sure is a nasty little female dog.
but so is O.j.
2007-09-19 19:24:33
·
answer #4
·
answered by writersbIock2006 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think you're feeding into the media's bait. I'm sure there are white people who do think he's innocent. But you won't see that on television because that doesn't bring in the ratings.
There are circumstances surround the fact that OJ is guilty. Whether he's innocent or not (back around the time that his wife was murdered), there was no need for him to flee in that Bronco of his. Sounds suspicious to me, and a lot of other people. I don't find that racist.
Oh yeah, and once again, I'm sick of this race card crap!
2007-09-19 19:16:57
·
answer #5
·
answered by Maverick Zero 4
·
3⤊
0⤋
I don't really know if he is guilty of theft because I don't know if he owned the property or not, the courts will decide. I do know that he admitted to being their and that the people their had guns. Now if you pull a gun on someone and threaten them that is illegal. He has admitted to being at least that guilty even if he hasn't plead guilty.
I think the reason why most people think he is guilty is because he was acquitted of murdering his wife and friend. He then turned around and wrote a book about how he would have done it. I think that would tend to turn people against you. Especially when the only thing that got you off of the murder rap was a good lawyer and the prosecution thinking they had an air tight case.
2007-09-19 19:21:37
·
answer #6
·
answered by Memnoch 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
You talk in circles. OJ was acquited in his murder trial because the prosecutors were stupid and inept. He did it and there shouldn't be any doubt about it. Now he has put his big number 12 foot into it again and this time he will be put away. Amen! For your information OJ is a very sick guy who has severe mental problems. He thinks that he can do anything he wants and get away with it. I don't care if he is black, white or purple (I am not a racist) he pulled off another crime and this time he has had it.
2007-09-19 19:16:51
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
Yes, it definitely proves it. I find myself being very prejudiced towards black people waving guns around. Of course, I'm also against white people doing that. Can we please not play the race card again. He was there, guns were involved. What's racist about that being against the law? He got away with a double murder and with an assult on a film crew. Maybe with three strikes he will be out. I think he is a very dangerous man towards anyone who gets in his way and should be locked up. He didn't look quite as cocky leaving the court room as he has been up until now. Could it be that three days in jail made a dent in him? I wonder how he's gonna pay Johnny Cochran for this trial?
2007-09-19 19:24:09
·
answer #8
·
answered by moonrose777 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
I am sick sick sick to death of OJ. I really don't care if he goes to jail or gets off scott free.
I don't want to see another photo or video of him walking or driving down the street.
I want to see real news about real issues.
The television reporters have lost there back bone and need to report real news that affects us.
Like the job and financial situation in America. They need to start asking politicians real questions about real issues.
The press these days never pressure the president for real answers.
I can get the same crap from the National Enquirer that I get on TV news.
There are a couple of exceptions to the rule about reporters but other then that most are just paparazzi.
2007-09-19 19:26:57
·
answer #9
·
answered by letfreedomring 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, please stop making assumptions. I'm white, I'm not racist and my belief about O.J.'s guilt has ZIP to do with racism. You're playing the race card yourself to bolster your argument and it fails. I believe I have looked at the case intelligently, but I believe you cannot. You seem blinded by concerns about racism and are offering nothing but warmed over conspiracy theories and too many what ifs. What about the evidence as it stands? That was enough to convince me. If the cops hadn't screwed up that crime scene so bad he'd be cooling his heels on Death Row as we speak. It's their fault the jury had to find him not guilty because of reasonable doubt over the cop's screw ups. Wow have you been reaching for the moon on these questions about him.
To the point that I don't even know which offense you're defending him for here. Are you talking about the murders (which I assumed due to your last question) or the current charges?
Is that you O.J.?
2007-09-19 19:15:16
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. If you believe your rant then I pity you. As for Fuhrman, had the whole story come out and Ito's conflict of interest dealing with him been public knowledge he'd never have taken the stand. OJ is a murderer and a thief and I hope they lock him up and throw away the key.
2007-09-19 19:31:07
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋