2007-09-19 15:43:56 · 16 answers · asked by reaganite27 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
oober.mann ~ When is the last time you were in touch with reality?
2007-09-19 15:50:20 · update #1
The liberals would see him laying a wreath and embrace him as a compassionate, peace loving individual. We'll just "talk" about it. Let's "talk" about our differences. Peace, love, harmony, hippies, marijuana, free-love, LSD, etc.
2007-09-19 15:51:22 · update #2
The dirty little midget is looking for a photo op. I say we knock him into the Hudson River in a cement burqa and let him sleep with the fishes.
2007-09-19 15:48:17 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 2⤋
No u . s . a . or mixtures of countries interior the middle east can decimate Israel. The Clerics of Iran run the country no longer Nejad. he's in user-friendly terms a load mouthed hate monger. WWlll i do no longer think anymore will initiate interior the middle east. it is going to initiate whilst some little no longer something u . s . a . does something stupid in its area of the international. Wars are fought for ideals, faith, foodstuff, territory, means, greed, and poverty. There has in no way been a stable conflict. maximum are fought for means and the human beings be damned. The losers in wars are the human beings who combat them and the human beings the place the wars are fought. Liberals, conservatives, Neo-Nazi's, religious followers and something will blame who ever is handy. there is not any perfect answer for why a conflict. there is not any incorrect answer the two.
2016-10-19 04:08:04 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Like everything politicians do, no doubt for appearances sake.
It would not have been a bad appearance for anyone. It would have had a positive effect on the attitudes of people in middle east towards the united states.
It would have been a fairly diplomatic thing to do, expressing sympathy for the US' loss, without inciting resentment in the majority of muslims.
There have been numerous requests from various individuals, over the last few years, for muslims in general to denounce themselves, or say they're real sorry, or something, as if they were all guilty as a group, or obliged to care about our problems.
In light of that I'd say it makes Americans look pretty small minded, turning Ahmadinejad down on his offer to make such a harmless and appropriate gesture.
2007-09-19 16:13:31 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
So now, no apology's good enough? Not even from someone we absolutely cannot implicate with the 9/11 attacks? There's absolutely no information linking him to those attacks. I DO NOT support him for what he said against Israel, and therefore I do not endorse any sort of support for him. However, he's making a symbolic gesture of sympathy towards the U.S., showing, maybe for the last time, that he can sympathize with the deaths of so many Americans in that attack. Why shouldn't he be allowed to lay a wreath there? What is the worst he could possibly do?
2007-09-19 15:58:05 · answer #4 · answered by whiteflame55 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Some say that Ahmadinejad wants to visit the site of jihad's greatest victory. Maybe. Maybe he wants to make some type of conciliatory remarks at the site for propaganda purposes.
The real question is why Mayor Bloomberg is honoring his request, given his outspoken anti-Semitism and his promises of a second Holocaust.
Why no comment from New York Senator Clinton?
2007-09-19 15:53:00 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
I KNOW WHAT CAUSED 9/11!
Calendars. I'll never forget the day those damn calendars tried to destroy our way of life. It's a good thing we are still the fattest nation in the world. Take that terrorist scum!
2007-09-19 15:51:18 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
It does not help any discussion or the understanding of political matters by using incorrect and unsuitable comparisons. Hitler was a terrible demagogue and war criminal, under whose rule millions perished needlessly.
Whatever one might think of the current (and democratically elected) President of Iran, he is certainly no Hitler.
2007-09-19 15:53:29 · answer #7 · answered by Magic Gatherer 4 · 1⤊ 4⤋
To quietly chuckle to himself and lay a wreath to commerorate his 19 heroes.
2007-09-19 15:46:28 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 5⤋
To look like he cares
2007-09-19 15:48:00 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 1⤋
So he could piss on the memorial of 3000 or so dead Americans - or at least 3000 dead infidels.
2007-09-19 15:50:59 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋