http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/traderesult?players=2377~2381~285~2435~3224~3188~2991~3205~273~434~3015~2760~615&teams=11~26~26~11~11~4~11~11~11~4~4~4~26&te=&cash=
Please comment on trade on how it will work, or it will not
2007-09-19 15:25:18 · 12 answers · asked by yahoo2000 2 in Sports ➔ Basketball
I think it would not work for Indiana. See there would be too many players going to their team not to mention too many SF-Gs and have only one post player (who by the way is an unproven rookie) by the name of Joakim Noah.
Good trades for Chicago and Utah though.
2007-09-19 15:49:47 · answer #1 · answered by Darth Revan 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not bad, but I really don't think Utah is willing to give up Millsap. I think everyone can agree he was THE steal in the 06 draft...way too much potential to let go just yet. Second, O'Neal has a huge contract and is too 'big' of a player to play along side Boozer, Okur, and Williams. I just don't think there is enough room for that many big scorers. Too many All-Stars playing at once will ultimately leave someone unhappy.
2007-09-19 15:56:11 · answer #2 · answered by Stryder77 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
are you a utah fan? it looks like you give up junk to chicago and indiana and get all the goods.
Chicago:
You don't expect to give up their rising sg, their rookie pf, and backup pg for an overpaid AK47, a good forward in granger (not good enough), and two unknowns.
Wallace
granger
deng
sefalosha
hinrich
whould that replace the solid starters of chicago? there are 4 years left in AK47's contract, if he gets traded, it should be a team who has the capability to give him time to play to worth his salary.
Utah- wow! they never really lost anyone, since everyone knows sloan and kirilenko never too sides, they give up bench for an old JO, but still worth a shot, and a rising sg in gordon.
JO
Boozer
Okur
Gordon
D. williams
Pretty solid line up from C to PG. Nice for them.
Indiana- well they give up granger, for duhon and noah
Foster
Noah
dunleavy
M. Daniels
Duhon
Well yeah if rebuilding is their thing. Young players to develop. Overall only Utah will have smiles on their faces.
2007-09-20 01:28:33 · answer #3 · answered by rayne 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Definetly, the Jazz will benefit from this trade... Getting both, O'Neal and Gordon will support the Williams/Boozer duo... and only one star gone in Kirilenko, good things might happen in Utah... The Bulls, meanwhile, will be the losers because they letting out their young talents and bringing in players with less winning tradition compared to what they have... in The Pacers situation, it clearly means they stick to their long term plan and get the right thing wth tese young bunch of players...
2007-09-19 19:10:23 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
The Bulls are getting jipped in this trade. No way they'd ever give up Gordon, Duhon, and Noah and only expect one quality player in return.
2007-09-19 15:47:37 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I dont think of the Kings might commerce Evans and their 5th p.c.. for Deng. I propose in the event that they are gonna sell off their ultimate participant and a severe draft p.c.., it greater advantageous be for a participant which could grant them plenty. I propose the squaddies have been speaking approximately procuring and promoting like Beidrins/Wright+seventh p.c.. for Deng+some thing. i like Deng plenty and exceedingly his protection. yet we could face it the guy averaged over 39mpg final 12 months yet nevertheless basically averaged 15 factors a interest and thats with Rose lacking a good number of video games. He shot 40-one% from the sector. no longer the final passer. yet a sturdy small forward. i for my section dont think of a a million for a million commerce Deng for Evans might additionally be straightforward, no longer to point Kings giving up that 5 p.c...
2016-10-05 01:07:44 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not even close too being a good trade for any of the teams!
2007-09-19 20:06:40 · answer #7 · answered by Steven R 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
As long as KH doesn't end up making my Pacers automatically overrated, I'm fine with this trade.
2007-09-19 17:02:31 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not bad other than the fact that Boozer would have to go to Chicago for this to work.
2007-09-19 16:10:25 · answer #9 · answered by NBA Blazer #7 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No way.
Gordon, Duhon and Noah for Kirilenko and scrubs?
2007-09-19 17:43:14 · answer #10 · answered by Jeremy K 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋