What possible reason could they have for not allowing Mahmoud Ahmedinijad to pay his respects?
Are they afraid it will ruin their campaign of fear and lies about Iran?
2007-09-19 14:19:24 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
In fact there were many Muslims killed in the attack.
2007-09-19 14:26:42 · update #1
Star! Hey I think you called it. I'm a realist people! I am also probably what you would call a neocon, but i'm not a fool. I know propaganda when I see it, and we don't want to allow him to one up us. Of coarse we're gonna block that. I simply thought he made a good point.
2007-09-19 14:22:46 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
No, they think that is supporting the troops, while they cut the funds of VA Hospitals and the wounded have sued the US government to get care. Pretty sad when the wounded are not even taken care of, but the tax cuts to the rich were.
Iran FUNDED 9/11! What a liar! Prove it! And why didn't we attack Iran? The truth is Bush has been selling them F-14 spare parts for his entire term!
We are a state sponsor of terrorism and have been for years, most done by the CIA! Who are you people think they are kidding. Hell, Bush even has his own personal army he has been paying for, Blackwater! I believe that is grounds for impeachment!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nqM4tKPDlR8
Iran had nothing to do with 9/11 either, so you right wing clueless can lay that one to rest!
Though I am opposed to Ahmedinijad's laying of a wreath as it was Iran backed Hezbollah that attacked and killed 242 Marines in Lebanon!
If Iran is so bad why was Reagan selling them missiles and Bush selling them spare parts for f-14's, which we sold them?
And why were you neocons supporting Iran and the Hezbollah terrorist against Israel! We know why dont we?
2007-09-19 14:28:18 · answer #2 · answered by cantcu 7 · 3⤊ 3⤋
They just don't want to look weak in the eyes of Iran--by saying that they were more "concerned" about Ahmedinijad's safety and the fact that Iran is a state-sponsor of terrorism.
You know: The usual rhetoric BS from the Bush administration's lackeys.
2007-09-19 14:29:55 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
that is extra a sign to Iran and something of the international that we and everyone could know that Iran is in the back of a lot of whats happening in Iraq. i individually know some men there that have detained some Iranians who have been there blowing each little thing up.... so which you may permit the pinnacle fool of a rustic of idiots there may well be virtually sacrilege. yet nonetheless, it would be candy to have a percentof him there with a wreath in his hand with a bullet hollow in his head :)
2016-10-19 03:57:31 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
USA + Mahmoud Ahmedinijad = ur opinion
2007-09-19 14:38:25 · answer #5 · answered by elle 4 · 0⤊ 3⤋
It's because people apply the 9/11 attacks to anyone wiht a Muslim name. It's really sad, because obviously a lot of Muslims live in this country and yet they are being implicated as terrorist sympathizers. That's why they say he can't do it. Despite the fact that there might very well have been many Muslims killed in the attack.
2007-09-19 14:25:55 · answer #6 · answered by whiteflame55 6 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Are you so concerned with this that you are telling us your opinion with horrible questions? With the ammount of garbage that comes out of Ahmedinijad's mouth and the ridiculous claims he has made... I would not let him near ground zero either. Stop pushing your opinion on us. If you feel it's so horrible then write your congressman. Otherwise keep it to yourself.
2007-09-19 14:28:40 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 4⤋
"im a damn nut job" does not want to pay respect, he wants to slap us in the face. WTC groud zero is sacred ground and shoudl not be accessible, to people like him
2007-09-19 14:36:54 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Iran funded 9-11!!!
2007-09-19 14:27:18 · answer #9 · answered by soulsearcher 5 · 2⤊ 4⤋
About the only ones who want him at the site are: You,conspiracy theorists,anarchists,radical Muslims and the koo koo leftos. Congratulations!
2007-09-19 14:29:11 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 4⤋