2007-09-19 13:28:07 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Robots are built with logic circuits and therefore it would take all the excitement out of watching a president make these illogical outrageous comments. There would never be double speak from a robot...
2007-09-19 13:37:25 · answer #1 · answered by deanna b 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
A robot of the type you need for that job doesn't exist.
A robot is a machine that is programed to do a specific job
Artificial intelligence doesn't exist. At least not YET.
It is easy to prove that fact. Ask a question of a computer (and robots are generally controlled by computers) that the computer is NOT set up to accept or answer and it IMMEDIATELY becomes OBVIOUS there is no such thing as Artificial Intelligence. (And that also casts doubt on the intelligence of some candidates.)
Ergo: no robot to act as President.
Go support and vote for the candidate who best represents what you want America to become.
2007-09-19 13:42:22 · answer #2 · answered by Philip H 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
we do...maybe a chimp or a cyborg or even a toaster would be better. And to think he was voted in TWICE!!!!!!! What does that say about the intellect of the American voter, and the unfairness of a system which only lets us hear from candidates with money! Vote the goat!
2007-09-19 13:38:12 · answer #3 · answered by inkgddss 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
because President Bush is a great president trying his hardest to do the right thing. and robots dont even have brains, and God didn't intend robots to rule the U.S.
2007-09-19 13:32:30 · answer #4 · answered by usn809 1 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Have you ever seen the movie I Robot? Yeah watch it and then thats why :)
2007-09-19 13:31:14 · answer #5 · answered by crystal_of_ravenclaw 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Star trek technology doesn't exist.
Yet.
2016-02-17 08:49:24 · answer #6 · answered by Phillip 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree if, I can make the software.
And then we get a answering-phone
who say we surrender
if someone declares war
And sac the military
no more war
more babys
love alf
2007-09-19 13:54:36 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, i could see a whole lot of controversy over who gets to program that robot...
2007-09-19 13:32:19 · answer #8 · answered by shroomigator 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Ah, wouldn't that be nice for a change. But unfortunately, there'll still be some human behind him holding the "remote".
2007-09-19 13:32:29 · answer #9 · answered by ṼξŋØლǿԱ§ 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Because Frankenheinz lost in 04'.
2007-09-19 13:32:08 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋