What possible outcome would there be from using a taser on the Constitution.
2007-09-19 13:25:56
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
0⤋
Cons do not believe that breaking the law and causing a public disturbance, resisting arrest, and failing to comply with a police officer is a right under the constitution..
2007-09-19 20:26:35
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
I value my right to own one so that I can tasered idiots
2007-09-19 20:27:58
·
answer #3
·
answered by tap158 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
Tasering a liberal who starts fights with cops deserves getting tasered.
2007-09-19 20:27:50
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
2⤋
The guy who got Tased was disrupting John Kerry, no way a Con would want to stop that. This was all about Libs.
2007-09-19 20:26:40
·
answer #5
·
answered by Yo it's Me 7
·
4⤊
1⤋
Would an idiot kid value rules on timed questions and not resist arrest Think First
2007-09-19 21:09:51
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Do people like you even value your integrity after you say things like this. It just shows the depths of your ignorance.
2007-09-19 20:26:54
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
No - This is as dumb as your other Taser question
2007-09-19 20:37:23
·
answer #8
·
answered by meathookcook 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
You do realize that Cons have eyes, don't you? LOL
2007-09-19 20:32:49
·
answer #9
·
answered by ? 7
·
0⤊
3⤋
Of course not. Don't be stupid.
2007-09-19 21:00:28
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋