Ballpark figure will do.
2007-09-19 11:43:04 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Social Science ➔ Anthropology
Dammit Durden™, you will note that this question is in the Anthropology section.
2007-09-19 11:54:21 · update #1
mikearion
Yeah, Fred Flistone is totally unreputable. Can you repute the constancy of the speed of light?
2007-09-19 17:10:29 · update #2
Have you seen the video on Youtube about the Creationist Museum in Kentucky? Turns out, they built that monstrosity on top of one of the coolest, most famous fossil beds in the United States. I worked down that way on an archaeological dig, and we were finding limestone with nice fossils all over the place, just in people's fields. It's too bad that their faith is so weak that they have to deny science and everything we've found out about God's creation with our God-given brains rather than accept that maybe a book could be wrong.
2007-09-20 09:50:20 · answer #1 · answered by random6x7 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The speed of light constancy applies to a vacuum. In Bose-Einstein condensates, it gets slowed down, and even stopped by smart scientist.
As far as Cretionism goes the inanity is not exclusive.
How many times have reputable scientist rejected new ideas? The answer is, most of the time. Plate tectonics was not accepted for decades, the Big Bang took a long time to be accepted.
Be gentle with the Cretins, they are being pounded by fear and peer pressure.
2007-09-19 18:33:47 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Hehehehehehehehehehehehehe jesus wept what a crock of shite,how does a rustic this large and supposedly forward finding finally end up helping a topic park for individuals who can no longer think of for themselves,merely because of the fact they have a museum geared up,would not supply it and credance and would desire to have a disclaimer asserting that's no longer a longtime or shown fact and that technology says distinctive.....you somewhat do want a civil conflict over there in any different case this expansionism and forcing of non secular values will proceed to debase you as a respected u . s . a . and that does no longer be undemanding on the final public of your people....
2016-10-09 12:01:34 · answer #3 · answered by finkle 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why are you bashing Cretinists, next thing you know you'll go after Retardapalians, Droolistians and Morons... Such intollerance.
2007-09-20 05:38:04 · answer #4 · answered by Aquatic Rodent '") 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's several letters removed, clearly. Too many letters, in fact, for it to be an amusing pun.
2007-09-20 07:38:06 · answer #5 · answered by The Ry-Guy 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Next door.
2007-09-19 22:09:36 · answer #6 · answered by Spsipath 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Look I did all the R&S stuff today to say their all bonkers so don't you start too.
gee the doors looked similar. go figure.
2007-09-19 11:51:08 · answer #7 · answered by tyler durden 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Don't make me come over there.
Hand me the remote will ya?
2007-09-19 21:46:03 · answer #8 · answered by Marla ™ 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hmmm sounds like you are truly afraid of the evidence there. Can’t debunk it so just crack a joke or two and it will all go away.
I think I'll go take a look at what they have that's got you so worried.
2007-09-19 14:56:06 · answer #9 · answered by mikearion 4 · 0⤊ 5⤋
Bout dat far!
2007-09-19 11:51:27 · answer #10 · answered by Wounded Duck 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋